Skip to main content
Clinical Trials/NCT01500252
NCT01500252
Completed
Phase 4

A Randomized Clinical Trial Comparing Patellar Resurfacing Versus Patellar Retention in Total Knee Arthroplasty Using the PROFIX* Total Knee System

University of Alberta1 site in 1 country38 target enrollmentSeptember 1996

Overview

Phase
Phase 4
Intervention
Not specified
Conditions
Total Knee Replacement
Sponsor
University of Alberta
Enrollment
38
Locations
1
Primary Endpoint
Change in WOMAC Osteoarthritis Index Function Score From Preoperative to 5 Years Postoperative
Status
Completed
Last Updated
4 years ago

Overview

Brief Summary

Background:

Despite the excellent results of total knee replacement, also known as total knee arthroplasty (TKA) there is persistent controversy over whether or not to replace the surface of the kneecap. Anterior knee pain, which occurs with variable and unpredictable frequency, continues to be a problem in a subset of TKA patients. Some clinicians replace the surface of all kneecaps during TKA to avoid repeat surgery, which occurs in approximately 10% of cases. However, others cite the complications attributed to replacing the surface of kneecap as reasons to avoid this procedure.

This study prospectively randomized patients receiving TKA into two groups, those receiving replacement of the kneecap surface and those left without replacement of the kneecap surface to determine clinical outcomes and revisions over the first 5-10 postoperative years.

Objectives:

The primary objective of this work was to compare pain, stiffness and function between groups at five years postoperatively. Secondarily, we compared pain, stiffness and function at one and 10 years postoperatively. Finally, we examined the number of reoperations following TKR over 10 years in the 2 groups of subjects. The investigators hypothesized that there would be no difference between the two groups of subjects in the measured outcomes.

Methods:

Patients receiving TKA were prospectively enrolled before surgery and randomized intraoperatively to either receive a replacement of the kneecap surface or have no kneecap intervention. The Smith and Nephew Profix TKA system was implanted in all cases; the post-operative regimen was standardized. Subjects were assessed pre-operatively and at 1 and 5 years postoperatively for pain, function, and stiffness using a disease-specific (Western Ontario and MacMaster Osteoarthritis Index [WOMAC]) and generic health status (Short Form 36 [SF-36]) questionnaire. At the end of the five year follow-up, the study was extended to a 10-year followup and the same outcomes were assessed. The revision rate was also compared between the two groups at the end of the 10-year follow-up.

Registry
clinicaltrials.gov
Start Date
September 1996
End Date
December 2009
Last Updated
4 years ago
Study Type
Interventional
Study Design
Parallel
Sex
All

Investigators

Responsible Party
Sponsor

Eligibility Criteria

Inclusion Criteria

  • scheduled for primary TKA to treat non-inflammatory arthritis
  • age 40- 75 years of age

Exclusion Criteria

  • history of knee sepsis
  • previous patellectomy
  • previous high tibial osteotomy
  • knee flexion contracture of \>20 degrees
  • varus or valgus deformity of \> 20 degrees
  • \< 90 degrees of knee flexion
  • tibial or femoral bone deficiency requiring augmentation

Outcomes

Primary Outcomes

Change in WOMAC Osteoarthritis Index Function Score From Preoperative to 5 Years Postoperative

Time Frame: Preoperative to 5 years postoperative

This measures the change in patients' reported function from preoperative to 5 years postoperative. The WOMAC Function scale has a minimum value of 0 (worst function) to a maximum value of 100 (no functional limitations). The change score was calculated by subtracting the preoperative score from the five year score.

Change in Western Ontario MacMaster (WOMAC) Osteoarthritis Index Pain Score From Preoperative to 5 Years Postoperative

Time Frame: Preoperative to 5 years postoperative

This index assesses pain as reported by the patient. The WOMAC Pain scale has a minimum value of 0 (worst pain) to a maximum value of 100 (no pain). The change score was calculated by subtracting the preoperative score from the five year score.

Change in WOMAC Osteoarthritis Index Stiffness Score From Preoperative to 5 Years Postoperative

Time Frame: Preoperative to 5 years postoperative

This is the change in the patients' perceived pain between preoperative and 5 years postoperative. The WOMAC stiffness scale has a minimum value of 0 (maximal stiffness) to a maximum value of 100 (no stiffness). The change score was calculated by subtracting the preoperative score from the five year score.

Secondary Outcomes

  • Change in WOMAC Osteoarthritis Index Stiffness Score From 5 Years Postoperative to 10 Years Postoperative(5 years postoperative to 10 years postoperative)
  • Change in WOMAC Osteoarthritis Index Pain Score From Preoperative to 1 Year Postoperative(Preoperative to 1 year postoperative)
  • Change in WOMAC Osteoarthritis Index Function Score From Preoperative to 1-year Postoperative(Preoperative to 1 year postoperative)
  • Change in WOMAC Osteoarthritis Index Stiffness Score From Preoperative to 1 Year Postoperative(Preoperative to 1 year postoperative)
  • Change in WOMAC Osteoarthritis Index Function Score From 5 Years Postoperative to 10 Years Postoperative(5 years postoperative to 10 years postoperative)
  • Number of Revision Surgeries(10 years)
  • Change in WOMAC Osteoarthritis Index Pain Score From 5 Years Postoperative to 10 Years Postoperative(5 years postoperative to 10 years postoperative)

Study Sites (1)

Loading locations...

Similar Trials