Assessment of the Morphological Concordance Between CT and Cone Beam in Sinus Imagery
Overview
- Phase
- Not Applicable
- Intervention
- Computed Tomography
- Conditions
- Sinonasal Pathologies
- Sponsor
- University Hospital, Toulouse
- Enrollment
- 50
- Locations
- 2
- Primary Endpoint
- intraclass correlation coefficient
- Status
- Completed
- Last Updated
- 23 days ago
Overview
Brief Summary
This study compares the morphological concordance between CT (computed tomography) and cone beam in sinus on 26 validated items. CT and cone beam is performed on each patient. Performances of these two imagery technics seem to be closed. Nevertheless, the exposure of the ionizing radiations is lower with the cone beam.
Investigators
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria
- •man or woman older than 18 years old
- •patient affected by sinonasal pathology : who show one or more of the following functional sign : anosmia, pain with sinusal origin (frontal headache, lower-orbital throbbing pain increased in anteflexion, chronic unexplained headache), nasal blockage, runny nose, epistaxis requiring the realisation of a sinus imagery overview.
Exclusion Criteria
- •Deprivation of liberty by administrative or legal decision
- •patients under 18 years old
- •Patients in emergency
Arms & Interventions
patients with sinonasal pathology
Computed Tomography Cone Beam Computed Tomography
Intervention: Computed Tomography
patients with sinonasal pathology
Computed Tomography Cone Beam Computed Tomography
Intervention: Cone Beam Computed Tomography
Outcomes
Primary Outcomes
intraclass correlation coefficient
Time Frame: 1 day
Assessment of the morphological concordance between the CT and the Cone Beam in the sinus imagery with 26 validated items.
Secondary Outcomes
- morphological concordance between cone beam and CT(1 day)
- Diagnosis concordance radio-endoscopic and radio-surgical(1 day)
- reproductibility INTER-OBSERVER(1 day)
- dosimetry(1 day)