Implant Placement in Mandibular Molar Xenograft Versus PRF

Not Applicable

• Conditions: Edentulous Alveolar Ridge
• Interventions: Procedure: extraction,implant placement,PRF; Procedure: Exctraction,Implant placement,Bone graft

• Registration Number: NCT03177356
• Lead Sponsor: Cairo University

Brief Summary

20 recruited patients indicated for immediate implant placement in mandibular molar patients are divided into 2 groups each group contain 15 patients, one group assigned for placement of bovine bone after molar extraction and immediate implant placement, while the other group we use Platelet-rich fibrin as space filling material.

Detailed Description

Not available

Basic Information
|
Recruitment & Eligibility
|
Study & Design

Study Timeline

• Study Start: 2016-07
• Status Verified: 2017-06
• Study First Submitted: 2017-06-03
• Study First Submitted QC: 2017-06-05
• Last Update Submitted: 2017-06-05
• Study First Posted: 2017-06-06
• Last Update Posted: 2017-06-06
• Primary Completion: 2017-07
• Study Completion: 2017-07

Recruitment & Eligibility

• Status: UNKNOWN
• Sex: All
• Target Recruitment: 20

Inclusion Criteria

1. Patients with non-restorable mandibular molars

2. Both sexes

Read More

Exclusion Criteria

• • Heavy smokers more than 20 cigarettes per day.5

  • Patients with in sufficient interseptal bone height and width

    • Patients with systemic disease that may affect normal healing.
    • Patients with completely resorbed buccal cortical plate.

Read More

Study & Design

• Study Type: INTERVENTIONAL
• Study Design: PARALLEL

Arm && Interventions

Group	Intervention	Description
extraction,implant placement,PRF	extraction,implant placement,PRF	Extraction of Mandibular first molar and Implant placement followed by Placement of placement of Platelet rich fibrin as space filling material
Exctraction,Implant placement,Bone graft	Exctraction,Implant placement,Bone graft	Extraction of mandibular first molar followed by implant placement and xenogenic bone graft as space filling material

Primary Outcome Measures

Name	Time	Method
Patient satisfaction	1 week post operative	evaluation of postoperative complications regarding pain and oedema

Secondary Outcome Measures

Name	Time	Method
amount of bone gained or lost around the implants	6 months postoperative	two cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) will be taken for the patient, one immediate postoperative and the other 6 months after the operation then the height of bone gained or lost around the implants will be assessed by superimposing the same section in the two CBCTS
implant stability	will be measure intraopertively immediately after insertion of the implants and will be measure one more time 6 months after 1st operation at the time of exposure of implants	measurement of implant stability using osstell device