Immediate Implant Placement With Immediate Professionalization in Aesthetic Area

Not Applicable

• Conditions: Implant Site Reaction
• Interventions: Other: immediate implant using mixed allograft and xenograft

• Registration Number: NCT03665025
• Lead Sponsor: Cairo University

Brief Summary

Immediate implant placement with immediate professionalization in the maxillary esthetic zone using mixture of allograft and xenograft vs xenografts to augment the jumping gap

Detailed Description

Implant placement in fresh extraction sockets in conjunction with appropriate guided bone regeneration has many benefits, which ultimately affect the total treatment plan. The immediate placement of implants provides significant advantages, including fewer surgical procedures, shorter treatment time, and improved esthetics. The goals of osseous replacement are maintenance of contour, elimination of dead space, and reduce postoperative infection, provide good support for dental implant and enhance bony and soft tissue healing. allograft bone has gold standard over other augment techniques including favorable bone quality and minimal bone resorption.

Study Timeline

• Status Verified: 2018-09
• Study First Submitted: 2018-09-06
• Study First Submitted QC: 2018-09-10
• Last Update Submitted: 2018-09-10
• Study First Posted: 2018-09-11
• Last Update Posted: 2018-09-12
• Study Start: 2019-01-01
• Primary Completion: 2019-01-01
• Study Completion: 2019-01-01

Recruitment & Eligibility

• Status: UNKNOWN
• Sex: All
• Target Recruitment: 2

Inclusion Criteria

• Adult patients with badly broken teeth in upper esthetic zone indicated for extraction, presence of at least 4 mm of bone beyond the root apex to guarantee implant primary stability, implant placement within the alveoli confines.
• Both sexes.
• No intraoral soft and hard tissue pathology.
• No systemic condition that contraindicate implant placement.

Read More

Exclusion Criteria

• Presence of fenestrations or dehiscence of the residual bony Walls after extraction.
• Heavy smokers more than 20 cigarettes per day .(24)
• Patients with systemic disease that may affect normal healing.
• Psychiatric problems
• Disorders to implant are related to history of radiation therapy to the head and neck neoplasia, or bone augmentation to implant site.

Read More

Study & Design

• Study Type: INTERVENTIONAL
• Study Design: PARALLEL

Arm && Interventions

Group	Intervention	Description
immediate implant placement with xenograft	immediate implant using mixed allograft and xenograft	Immediate implant placement with the use of xenograft as grafting material
immediate implant using mixed allograft and xenograft	immediate implant using mixed allograft and xenograft	Immediate implant placement with using mixture of allograft and xenograft material

Primary Outcome Measures

Name	Time	Method
Crestal bone loss	1 year	Will be measured using calliper with scale(1-10mm) for evaluation of crestal bone loss around implant which are the lower values represent a better outcome.

Secondary Outcome Measures

Name	Time	Method
Patient satisfaction	1 year	Will be measured using a satisfaction table chart which divided in 4 paraments with scale from 1-4 include( pain-infection-radiography-successful implant ),the number represent (4 excellent-3 very good -2 good-1 bad)

Trial Locations

Locations (1)

Mohammed; 🇰🇼 Kuwait, Q8, Kuwait