Older Men's Decision Making About Active Surveillance for Prostate Cancer - Aim 3: Decision Aid Efficacy Testing
- Conditions
- Prostate Cancer
- Registration Number
- NCT06785441
- Lead Sponsor
- M.D. Anderson Cancer Center
- Brief Summary
This protocol describes pilot testing of an educational shared decision-making intervention to help men with localized prostate cancer make decisions with their health care providers about if and when to de-escalate surveillance testing. The project is important because for many patients their cancer does not progress to the point of needed curative treatment or their health status changes such that they are no longer good candidates for treatment. For these men, de-escalating ongoing surveillance (e.g., fewer biopsies or imaging studies) is a reasonable option.
- Detailed Description
Primary Objective:
The overall goal of this protocol is to test initial efficacy of three versions of an educational tool for use by patients and health-care providers to help men with localized prostate cancer make informed decisions about discontinuation of active surveillance. A pre-post design was selected to provide initial efficacy data of the different versions of the shared decision-making intervention. Thereby, providing preliminary data in preparation for a follow-up comparative study.
Recruitment & Eligibility
- Status
- RECRUITING
- Sex
- Male
- Target Recruitment
- 180
Patients:
- Males aged 65 or older
- Diagnosis of localized prostate cancer
- Have not received curative intent treatment for their prostate cancer
- Fluent in English
Care partners/caregivers:
- Aged 18 or older
- Fluent in English
- Involved with the care of an eligible patient (i.e. partner, close friend, family member, companion)
Patients
- Currently receiving treatment for another cancer (primary or recurrence)
Care partners/caregivers
- None
Study & Design
- Study Type
- OBSERVATIONAL
- Study Design
- Not specified
- Primary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method Preparation for Decision Making Scale Through study completion and average of 1 year The Preparation for Decision Making Scale (PrepDM)19 is a validated scale that assesses whether the decision aid helped prepare a patient to talk with their clinician in making a treatment decision. The scale has 10 items with a 5-point Likert response format,
Score Scale 1 (not at all) and 5 (a great deal).
- Secondary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method
Related Research Topics
Explore scientific publications, clinical data analysis, treatment approaches, and expert-compiled information related to the mechanisms and outcomes of this trial. Click any topic for comprehensive research insights.
Trial Locations
- Locations (1)
M.D. Anderson Cancer Center
🇺🇸Houston, Texas, United States