Effects of HFOT on Exercise Performance in Patients With COPD. A Randomized, Controlled Trial.
- Conditions
- Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease
- Interventions
- Combination Product: High-flow oxygen therapy (HFOT)Combination Product: Low-flow oxygen therapy (LFOT)
- Registration Number
- NCT03955770
- Lead Sponsor
- University of Zurich
- Brief Summary
This will be a randomized, cross-over trial evaluating the efficacy of nasal high-flow oxygen therapy (HFOT) vs. low-flow oxygen therapy (LFOT) on cycling endurance in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD).
- Detailed Description
This will be a randomized, cross-over trial evaluating the efficacy of nasal HFOT vs. LFOT on cycling endurance in patients with COPD. Each patient will perform two constant load cycling exercise tests to exhaustion using HFOT and LFOT on two consecutive days, respectively, according to randomization. The load of the cycle ergometer will be set at 75% of the individually estimated maximum work rate (Wmax). During exercise tests, LFOT will be provided by a standard nasal cannula at a flow rate of 3 L/min using an oxygen concentrator. HFOT will be applied by a dedicated large bore nasal cannula at a flow rate 60 L/min, FiO2 45%, temperature 32 °C, using a HFOT device.
Recruitment & Eligibility
- Status
- COMPLETED
- Sex
- All
- Target Recruitment
- 79
Not provided
Not provided
Study & Design
- Study Type
- INTERVENTIONAL
- Study Design
- CROSSOVER
- Arm && Interventions
Group Intervention Description LFOT first then HFOT Low-flow oxygen therapy (LFOT) - HFOT first then LFOT High-flow oxygen therapy (HFOT) - HFOT first then LFOT Low-flow oxygen therapy (LFOT) - LFOT first then HFOT High-flow oxygen therapy (HFOT) -
- Primary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method Exercise endurance time in seconds HFOT on day 1 vs. LFOT on day 2 or vice versa, according to randomization Difference in the exercise endurance time between HFOT vs. LFOT during a constant load exercise test at 75% of the maximal work capacity.
- Secondary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method Subjective leg fatigue sensation HFOT on day 1 vs. LFOT on day 2 or vice versa, according to randomization Difference in the exercise induced subjective leg fatigue sensation between HFOT vs LFOT assessed by the BORG CR10 scale ranging from 0 "no leg fatigue at all" to 10 "Maximum of leg fatigue" assessed at the end of exercise.
Dyspnea sensation HFOT on day 1 vs. LFOT on day 2 or vice versa, according to randomization Difference in the exercise induced dyspnea sensation between HFOT vs LFOT assessed by the BORG CR10 scale ranging from 0 "no dyspnea at all" to 10 "Maximum of dyspnea" assessed at the end of exercise.
Arterial blood gases HFOT on day 1 vs. LFOT on day 2 or vice versa, according to randomization Difference of parameters in the arterial blood gases, in particular pH, SaO2, PaO2 and PaCO2 between HFOT vs. LFOT at the end of exercise.
Heart rate in bpm HFOT on day 1 vs. LFOT on day 2 or vice versa, according to randomization Difference in the maximal heart rate assessed by ECG between HFOT vs. LFOT at the end of exercise.
Arterial blood pressure in mmHg HFOT on day 1 vs. LFOT on day 2 or vice versa, according to randomization Difference in the maximal blood pressure between HFOT vs. LFOT at the end of exercise.
Trial Locations
- Locations (1)
National Center of Cardiology and Internal Medicine
🇰🇬Bishkek, Kyrgyzstan