MedPath

Effects of HFOT on Exercise Performance in Patients With COPD. A Randomized, Controlled Trial.

Phase 4
Completed
Conditions
Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease
Interventions
Combination Product: High-flow oxygen therapy (HFOT)
Combination Product: Low-flow oxygen therapy (LFOT)
Registration Number
NCT03955770
Lead Sponsor
University of Zurich
Brief Summary

This will be a randomized, cross-over trial evaluating the efficacy of nasal high-flow oxygen therapy (HFOT) vs. low-flow oxygen therapy (LFOT) on cycling endurance in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD).

Detailed Description

This will be a randomized, cross-over trial evaluating the efficacy of nasal HFOT vs. LFOT on cycling endurance in patients with COPD. Each patient will perform two constant load cycling exercise tests to exhaustion using HFOT and LFOT on two consecutive days, respectively, according to randomization. The load of the cycle ergometer will be set at 75% of the individually estimated maximum work rate (Wmax). During exercise tests, LFOT will be provided by a standard nasal cannula at a flow rate of 3 L/min using an oxygen concentrator. HFOT will be applied by a dedicated large bore nasal cannula at a flow rate 60 L/min, FiO2 45%, temperature 32 °C, using a HFOT device.

Recruitment & Eligibility

Status
COMPLETED
Sex
All
Target Recruitment
79
Inclusion Criteria

Not provided

Exclusion Criteria

Not provided

Study & Design

Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Study Design
CROSSOVER
Arm && Interventions
GroupInterventionDescription
LFOT first then HFOTLow-flow oxygen therapy (LFOT)-
HFOT first then LFOTHigh-flow oxygen therapy (HFOT)-
HFOT first then LFOTLow-flow oxygen therapy (LFOT)-
LFOT first then HFOTHigh-flow oxygen therapy (HFOT)-
Primary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
Exercise endurance time in secondsHFOT on day 1 vs. LFOT on day 2 or vice versa, according to randomization

Difference in the exercise endurance time between HFOT vs. LFOT during a constant load exercise test at 75% of the maximal work capacity.

Secondary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
Subjective leg fatigue sensationHFOT on day 1 vs. LFOT on day 2 or vice versa, according to randomization

Difference in the exercise induced subjective leg fatigue sensation between HFOT vs LFOT assessed by the BORG CR10 scale ranging from 0 "no leg fatigue at all" to 10 "Maximum of leg fatigue" assessed at the end of exercise.

Dyspnea sensationHFOT on day 1 vs. LFOT on day 2 or vice versa, according to randomization

Difference in the exercise induced dyspnea sensation between HFOT vs LFOT assessed by the BORG CR10 scale ranging from 0 "no dyspnea at all" to 10 "Maximum of dyspnea" assessed at the end of exercise.

Arterial blood gasesHFOT on day 1 vs. LFOT on day 2 or vice versa, according to randomization

Difference of parameters in the arterial blood gases, in particular pH, SaO2, PaO2 and PaCO2 between HFOT vs. LFOT at the end of exercise.

Heart rate in bpmHFOT on day 1 vs. LFOT on day 2 or vice versa, according to randomization

Difference in the maximal heart rate assessed by ECG between HFOT vs. LFOT at the end of exercise.

Arterial blood pressure in mmHgHFOT on day 1 vs. LFOT on day 2 or vice versa, according to randomization

Difference in the maximal blood pressure between HFOT vs. LFOT at the end of exercise.

Trial Locations

Locations (1)

National Center of Cardiology and Internal Medicine

🇰🇬

Bishkek, Kyrgyzstan

© Copyright 2025. All Rights Reserved by MedPath