Skip to main content
Clinical Trials/NCT01841619
NCT01841619
Completed
Early Phase 1

Proof-of-Concept Study of IVIg Efficacy in Patients With Cutaneous Lupus Erythematosus

University of California, Irvine2 sites in 1 country16 target enrollmentMarch 2013
InterventionsIVIg
DrugsIVIg

Overview

Phase
Early Phase 1
Intervention
IVIg
Conditions
Cutaneous Lupus Erythematosus
Sponsor
University of California, Irvine
Enrollment
16
Locations
2
Primary Endpoint
Cutaneous Lupus Erythematosus Disease Area and Severity Index - Total Activity Score (CLASI - TAS)
Status
Completed
Last Updated
10 years ago

Overview

Brief Summary

The purpose of this research study is to show that non-steroidal treatment with intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIg) can replace current systemic immunosuppressive therapy in cutaneous lupus erythematosis (CLE) patients.

Detailed Description

The ultimate goal of this pilot project is to generate proof-of-concept data showing that treatment with intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIg) can replace current systemic immunosuppressive therapy in cutaneous lupus erythematosis (CLE) patients. This project has relevant clinical implications due to the severe side effects of and lack of response to current therapies. From the review of literature, it can be postulated that: 1. the beneficial effects of IVIg for patients with CLE should be prompt, with marked improvement within a few weeks; 2. clinical improvement should last several weeks after the last infusion; and 3. remission may be prolonged by maintenance IVIg therapy. Although this is only a non-controlled study, the investigator expects that IVIg will improve CLE, including those resistant to standard treatments. It is anticipated that treatment with IVIg will facilitate healing of extensive cutaneous lesions and achieve rapid remission. Maintenance therapy with repeated monthly pulses of IVIg is expected to keep the disease in remission during the treatment-free follow up observational period. The results will provide the basis a multicenter randomized controlled study to identify which CLE subsets will benefit the most and which protocol will provide the optimal clinical outcome.

Registry
clinicaltrials.gov
Start Date
March 2013
End Date
November 2014
Last Updated
10 years ago
Study Type
Interventional
Study Design
Single Group
Sex
All

Investigators

Responsible Party
Principal Investigator
Principal Investigator

Sergei Grando

Professor

University of California, Irvine

Eligibility Criteria

Inclusion Criteria

  • Evidence of a personally signed and dated informed consent document indicating that the subject has been informed of all pertinent aspects of the trial.
  • Subjects who are willing and able to comply with scheduled visits, treatment plan, laboratory tests, and other study procedures.
  • Be at least 18 years of age at time of informed consent.
  • Have had a diagnosis of CLE
  • Currently has active CLE (any subtype) established by standard clinical and histo- and immunopathologic criteria
  • Falls into one of the two following cohorts:
  • Cohort 1 - Has received a standard systemic therapy without a therapeutic response for a minimum of one month
  • Cohort 2 - Has not received any systemic treatment

Exclusion Criteria

  • Subject is not over 18 years of age.
  • Subject cannot understand or follow directions.
  • Subject is a female of child-bearing potential and unwilling to use a form of highly effective birth control.
  • Subject is pregnant, planning to get pregnant, or breast feeding.
  • Subject has a known history of immunoglobulin A (IgA) deficiency.

Arms & Interventions

IVIg as a monotherapy

IVIg will be used as a first line treatment. Topical treatment will be stopped at the beginning of IVIg therapy.

Intervention: IVIg

Outcomes

Primary Outcomes

Cutaneous Lupus Erythematosus Disease Area and Severity Index - Total Activity Score (CLASI - TAS)

Time Frame: Initial, 1st Visit - 9th Visit

Disease activity will be measured using the CLASI activity score that describes the activity of the disease. This score ranges from 0-70, with higher scores indicating more severe skin disease. This clinical assessment tool enables standardized assessments of response to therapy. Results expressed relative to the mean initial value of all patients, taken as 100%. Each proceeding visit will be relative to the initial visit. A decrease in percentage represents improvement while an increase in percentage indicates worsening of CLE. Visits occur on a month-to-month basis.

Skindex 29

Time Frame: Initial, 1st Visit - 9th Visit

The subjects also evaluated their skin-specific quality of life with the Skindex-29 - the questionnaire consisting of 29 items used to calculate three subscales: symptoms (pain, itch, burning, sensitivity), emotions (depression, anxiety, embarrassment, anger) and functioning (sleep, relationships with others). All assessments were repeated at all study visits. Results expressed relative to the mean initial value of all patients, taken as 100%. Each proceeding visit will be relative to the initial visit. A decrease in percentage represents improvement while an increase in percentage indicates worsening of CLE. Visits occur on a month-to-month basis.

Secondary Outcomes

  • Mean Percent Change in Physician's Subjective Assessment of Improvement (PSAI)(Initial, 1st Visit - 9th Visit)
  • Mean Percent Change in Physician's Subjective Assessment of Severity (PSAS)(Initial, 1st Visit - 9th Visit)
  • Cutaneous Lupus Erythematosus Disease Area and Severity Index - Total Damage Score (CLASI - TDS)(Initial, 1st Visit - 9th Visit)

Study Sites (2)

Loading locations...

Similar Trials