MedPath

Moxidectin Versus Ivermectin as Mass Drug Administration for the Control of Onchocerciasis and Other Neglected Tropical Diseases: A Cluster-randomised Trial

Not Applicable
Recruiting
Conditions
Onchocerciasis
Ascaris Lumbricoides Infection
Trichuris Trichiura; Infection
Hookworm Infections
Scabies
Interventions
Registration Number
NCT07145736
Lead Sponsor
Kirby Institute
Brief Summary

This clinical trial compares two treatments - ivermectin and moxidectin - to learn which is better at reducing the proportion of people with onchocerciasis (river blindness) when given through mass drug administration (MDA) in Angola. Both drugs are approved by the United States Food and Drug Administration (FDA) to treat this disease. The study also explores how these treatments affect other infections common in the region, including intestinal worms (soil-transmitted helminths) and scabies.

The trial aims to answer the following key questions:

* How do moxidectin and ivermectin compare in reducing the prevalence (how common the disease is) and intensity (amount of parasites per person) of onchocerciasis in the community?

* Do the treatments differ in their effect on the prevalence and intensity of soil-transmitted helminths and the prevalence of scabies?

* Does moxidectin reduce transmission of onchocerciasis more effectively than ivermectin, based on genetic testing of parasites in people and lab testing of the blackflies that carry the infection?

* How many more years of treatment would be needed to reach elimination with each drug, based on mathematical disease modelling?

* How do communities feel about receiving moxidectin versus ivermectin, and what factors help or make it harder to carry out MDA programs with moxidectin versus ivermectin?

The study takes place in Bié Province, Angola, and involves 20 groups of villages randomly assigned to receive either moxidectin or ivermectin once a year for four years. Prior to every round of MDA, researchers will collect skin, stool and blood samples from a sample of the people living in the study area. We believe the results will help guide global policy on the use of moxidectin in efforts to eliminate onchocerciasis and control related diseases.

Detailed Description

Not available

Recruitment & Eligibility

Status
RECRUITING
Sex
All
Target Recruitment
52000
Inclusion Criteria
  • Male or female children and adults
  • Residents in the villages selected for MDA treatment
Exclusion Criteria
  • Arm 1 (ivermectin): children under the age of 5 and/or under 90 cm of height
  • Arm 2 (moxidectin): children under the age of 12 years (who will receive ivermectin if they are at least 90 cm in height/5 years of age and above).
  • Arm 1 (ivermectin): Women breast-feeding babies under 45 days of age
  • Arm 2 (moxidectin): All breastfeeding women (who will be offered ivermectin if their infants is at least 45 days old)
  • Know allergy to ivermectin or moxidectin
  • Attending other clinical trials during the study
  • Pregnant
  • Arm 2 (moxidectin): Women planning to become pregnant in the 3 months post-treatment
  • Refusal to receive one or both study drugs, i.e. participants in villages allocated to receive moxidectin who refuse to receive moxidectin will be given the option to receive ivermectin; if they refuse to receive both drugs they will be excluded from the MDA altogether
  • Has an illness that makes them too sick or weak to get out of bed
  • Currently hospitalized

Study & Design

Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Study Design
PARALLEL
Arm && Interventions
GroupInterventionDescription
MoxidectinMoxidectinSingle oral dose of moxidectin treatment 8 mg (4 tablets of 2 mg of moxidectin), once per year
IvermectinIvermectinSingle oral dose of ivermectin treatment with approximately 150 µg/kg determined based on height (between 1 and 4 tablets of 3 mg of ivermectin), once per year
Primary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
Prevalence of Onchocerca volvulus microfilariae36 months after the first intervention

Prevalence of O. volvulus microfilariae at 36 months in skin snips, the marker most likely to show change in the shorter term as demonstrated by the therapeutic trials

Secondary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
Prevalence of O. volvulus microfilaria/mg skin12, 24 and 36 months after the first intervention
Microfilariae density (mean, median)12, 24 and 36 months after the first intervention
Prevalence of nodules12, 24 and 36 months after the first intervention
Prevalence of onchocerciasis skin disease12, 24 and 36 months after the first intervention
Proportion of black flies with infective O. volvulus larvae12, 24 and 36 months after the first intervention

Infection assessed based on all 3 are markers recommended by WHO to define population-level elimination

Prevalence of anti-Ov-1612, 24 and 36 months after the first intervention
Prevalence of Ascaris lumbricoides12, 24 and 36 months after the first intervention
Intensity of Ascaris lumbricoides12, 24 and 36 months after the first intervention
Prevalence of Trichuris trichiura12, 24 and 36 months after the first intervention
Intensity of Trichuris trichiuraBaseline and 12, 24 and 36 months after the first intervention
Prevalence of hookworm12, 24 and 36 months after the first intervention
Intensity of hookworm12, 24 and 36 months after the first intervention
Prevalence of Strongyloides stercoralis12, 24 and 36 months after the first intervention
Intensity of Strongyloides stercoralis12, 24 and 36 months after the first intervention
Prevalence of scabies/impetigo12, 24 and 36 months after the first intervention

Trial Locations

Locations (1)

Villages in Andulo and Nharea Municipalities

🇦🇴

Andulo, Bíe Province, Angola

Villages in Andulo and Nharea Municipalities
🇦🇴Andulo, Bíe Province, Angola
Marta Palmeirim, PhD
Contact
+351 916 563 622
mpalmeirim@kirby.unsw.edu.au

MedPath

Empowering clinical research with data-driven insights and AI-powered tools.

© 2025 MedPath, Inc. All rights reserved.