MedPath

Assessing Arrhythmias After Ablation Using Implantable Recorders

Not Applicable
Completed
Conditions
Atrial Fibrillation
Interventions
Device: Reveal XT implantable loop recorder
Registration Number
NCT01176617
Lead Sponsor
University of Pennsylvania
Brief Summary

The purpose of this study is to determine if continuous monitoring using an implantable loop recorder (ie. a device that is placed just underneath the skin of the chest and monitors the heart rate and rhythm) for a year long period after atrial fibrillation ablation may be superior to the current conventional monitoring strategy used by us for determination of atrial fibrillation recurrence (ie. return of the abnormal heart rhythm) and/or arrythmia burden (ie. how long the abnormal rhythm continues or how often the rhythm occurs). Some data suggests that continuous monitoring over longer periods may be better in identifying recurrence of atrial fibrillation after ablation and thus assist in its overall management. The device being used for this study is the Reveal XT, which, is currently FDA approved for monitoring all varieties of cardiac rhythm disorders including atrial fibrillation.

Detailed Description

Not available

Recruitment & Eligibility

Status
COMPLETED
Sex
All
Target Recruitment
44
Inclusion Criteria
  • Greater than 18 years
  • Undergoing ablation for atrial fibrillation at the University of Pennsylvania
Read More
Exclusion Criteria
  • Patients with already implanted devices, including pacemakers, implantable cardiac defibrillators and cardiac resynchronization devices
Read More

Study & Design

Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Study Design
SINGLE_GROUP
Arm && Interventions
GroupInterventionDescription
Reveal XTReveal XT implantable loop recorderSubjects will be monitored using the conventional monitoring strategy for the first 6 months post-ablation. During the next 6 months, subjects will be monitored using the data from the Reveal device, transmitted from home every 30 days.
Primary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
Arrhythmia Burden6 and 12 months

The primary outcome will be arrhythmia recurrences (atrial fibrillation and/or other atrial arrhythmias) after atrial fibrillation ablation over the initial 6 months and one year post-ablation as detected by the implantable loop recorder versus the conventional monitoring strategy. Months 1- 6 patients were being monitored by CM and ILR and in months 6 - 12 they were randomized to either ILR or CM.

Secondary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
Detection of Actionable Events Resulting in Change of Clinical Care12 months

Change of clinical care include initiation of previously discontinued and/or new anti-arrhythmic drugs, decision for repeat ablation, hospitalization for arrhythmias, discontinuation or reinitiation of atrio-ventricular nodal blocking agents, discontinuation or reinitiation af anticoagulation after ablation and/or decision to implant a pacemaker and/or defibrillator.

Trial Locations

Locations (1)

University of Pennsylvania

🇺🇸

Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States

© Copyright 2025. All Rights Reserved by MedPath