Skip to main content
Clinical Trials/NCT06645912
NCT06645912
Completed
Not Applicable

Effect of High Protein Nutritional Supplementation on Nutritional Status, Functional Capacity and Quality of Life in Older Patients With Gastric Cancer Receiving Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy

Erzincan Binali Yildirim University Mengucek Gazi Training and Research Hospital1 site in 1 country46 target enrollmentFebruary 1, 2023

Overview

Phase
Not Applicable
Intervention
Not specified
Conditions
Locally Advanced Gastric Adenocarcinoma
Sponsor
Erzincan Binali Yildirim University Mengucek Gazi Training and Research Hospital
Enrollment
46
Locations
1
Primary Endpoint
Change in Mini Nutritional Assessment (MNA) score
Status
Completed
Last Updated
last year

Overview

Brief Summary

This interventional prospective randomized controlled study was conducted to compare the effects of high-protein oral nutritional supplement (ONS) and medical nutritional therapy to medical nutrition therapy alone on nutritional status, quality of life, and physical function capacity after neoadjuvant chemotherapy in patients aged 65 and over with newly diagnosed locally advanced gastric cancer.

Detailed Description

This study is a prospective, randomized controlled trial conducted from February 2023 to February 2024, focusing on the effects of high-protein oral nutritional supplementation (ONS) in older patients (aged 65 and over) with newly diagnosed locally advanced gastric cancer undergoing neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC). Study Design: The trial involved two groups: Intervention group (ONS group) - Received ONS in addition to standard medical nutrition therapy. Control group (non-ONS group) - Received only standard medical nutrition therapy without ONS supplementation. Participants were randomized using computer-aided randomization, with 28 patients in each group. After excluding patients based on specific criteria (e.g., discontinuation of chemotherapy, refusal to consume ONS, or non-compliance with nutrition therapy), 23 patients remained in each group, totaling 46 patients for final analysis. Patients in the ONS group received a high-protein supplement containing 18.8 g of protein, 7 g of fat, 28 g of carbohydrates, and 250 calories per 200 mL. Both groups received personalized medical nutrition therapy based on their nutritional needs, calculated as 30 kcal/kg/day of energy and 1.5 g/kg/day of protein. Data Collection and Monitoring: Data was collected at three key time points: Baseline (Week 0): Assessments included anthropometric measurements, handgrip strength, food intake records, nutritional status evaluation (Mini Nutritional Assessment), biochemical markers, quality of life (EORTC QLQ-C30), functional status (ADL and IADL), and comorbidity index (Charlson Comorbidity Index). Mid-Intervention (Week 4): Food intake, MNA, and ONS adherence were re-assessed, with the ONS follow-up form and new anthropometric data collected. Post-Intervention (Week 8): Final assessments covered all previously mentioned parameters (anthropometry, handgrip strength, MNA, biochemical data, ADL, IADL, EORTC QLQ-C30), alongside an evaluation of compliance and ONS consumption. Statistical Analysis: The primary outcome measures were changes in nutritional status, physical function (handgrip strength, ADL, IADL), and quality of life (EORTC QLQ-C30) between baseline and week 8. Secondary outcomes included body composition changes (measured by BIA), adverse events (CTCAE v5.0), and dietary intake analysis using BEBIS software. The intervention's impact was evaluated by comparing pre- and post-intervention changes between the two groups.

Registry
clinicaltrials.gov
Start Date
February 1, 2023
End Date
February 23, 2024
Last Updated
last year
Study Type
Interventional
Study Design
Parallel
Sex
All

Investigators

Sponsor
Erzincan Binali Yildirim University Mengucek Gazi Training and Research Hospital
Responsible Party
Principal Investigator
Principal Investigator

Baran Akagündüz

MD, Associate Proffesor

Erzincan Binali Yildirim University Mengucek Gazi Training and Research Hospital

Eligibility Criteria

Inclusion Criteria

  • • Aged 65 years or older.
  • Newly diagnosed histological confirmed locally advanced gastric cancer (Stage IIa to IIIa).
  • Scheduled to receive Neoadjuvant chemotherapy.
  • ECOG performance status of 0-
  • Signed informed consent to participate

Exclusion Criteria

  • Severe comorbidities affecting survival within 3 months.
  • Inability to comply with study procedures.
  • Previous gastric surgery or chemotherapy.
  • Metastatic dissease (Stage IV)
  • Poor performance status (ECOG 3-4)
  • Early satge (Stage I)

Outcomes

Primary Outcomes

Change in Mini Nutritional Assessment (MNA) score

Time Frame: Baseline and 8 Weeks

Unit of Measure: MNA score (Units on a Scale). This will measure changes in nutritional status using the MNA scoring system, which ranges from 0 to 30. A higher score indicates better nutritional status (24-30: normal nutritional status, 17-23.5: at risk of malnutrition, \<17: malnourished).

Change in Handgrip Strength

Time Frame: Baseline and 8 Weeks

Unit of Measure: Kilograms (kg). Measured with a hand dynamometer, the average handgrip strength (kg) will be calculated based on three measurements of the dominant hand.

Change in EORTC QLQ-C30 (European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire - Core 30) score

Time Frame: Baseline and 8 Weeks

Unit of Measure: QLQ-C30 score (Units on a Scale). The EORTC QLQ-C30 evaluates quality of life across multiple domains, including physical, emotional, and social functioning. Scores range from 0 to 100, with higher scores indicating better quality of life in functioning scales but worse symptoms when higher scores are in symptom scales.

Change in 'Activities of Daily Living' (ADL) Score

Time Frame: Baseline and 8 Weeks

Unit of Measure: ADL score (Units on a Scale). The ADL scale assesses the patient's ability to perform basic daily tasks, such as bathing, dressing, and feeding. Scores range from 0 to 6, with higher scores indicating better physical function and independence.

Change in 'Instrumental Activities of Daily Living' (IADL) Score

Time Frame: Baseline and 8 Weeks

Unit of Measure: IADL score (Units on a Scale). The IADL scale evaluates the patient's ability to perform more complex daily tasks, such as managing finances and using transportation. Scores range from 0 to 8, with higher scores reflecting better functional independence.

Secondary Outcomes

  • Change in Body Weight(Baseline and 8 Weeks)
  • Change in Body Mass Index (BMI)(Baseline and 8 Weeks)
  • Change in Mid-Upper Arm Circumference(Baseline and 8 Weeks)
  • Change in Calf Circumference(Baseline and 8 Weeks)
  • Changes in Bioelectrical Impedance Analysis (BIA)(Baseline and 8 Weeks)

Study Sites (1)

Loading locations...

Similar Trials