COMPARison of Lumenless versus Stylet-driven Lead Systems in Left Bundle Branch Pacing - COMPARE LBBP

Not Applicable

Recruiting

• Conditions: Bradycardia; Heart failure; Pacemaker induced cardiomyopathy; Cardiovascular - Other cardiovascular diseases

• Registration Number: ACTRN12624000304538
• Lead Sponsor: Canberra heart rhythm foundation

Brief Summary

Not available

Detailed Description

Not available

Study Timeline

• Results First Posted: 1900-01-01
• Study Start: 2024-03-22
• Last Update Posted: 1 April 2024

Recruitment & Eligibility

• Status: Recruiting
• Sex: All
• Target Recruitment: 100

Inclusion Criteria

a)Age: 18 years and above
b)Recipients of left bundle branch pacing therapy

Exclusion Criteria

a) Metallic tricuspid valve implant
b) Venous anatomy unsuitable for transvenous pacing - e.g venous stenosis, congenital malformation
b)Refuse to/unable to give consent

Study & Design

• Study Type: Interventional
• Study Design: Not specified

Primary Outcome Measures

Name	Time	Method
Acute implant success rate[Successful capture of left bundle branch as indicated by paced RBBB morphology, V6 RWPT, V6-V1 inter-peak interval and transition from nonselective to selective left bundle or left ventricular septal capture during procedure. This will be determined during the procedure by observing the transition on surface ECG in cardiac electrophysiology laboratory. At implant]