MedPath

Randomized Trial With an Observational Component of Non-operative Versus Operative Treatment for AO Type A3 Fractures

Not Applicable
Withdrawn
Conditions
Spinal Fractures
Interventions
Procedure: Surgery + Bracing vs. Bracing Alone
Other: Patient's Choice
Registration Number
NCT02179697
Lead Sponsor
H Francis Farhadi
Brief Summary

The purpose of this study is to compare surgery plus bracing versus bracing alone. Both groups are considered standard of care treatments. The goal of this study is to determine which group is a better treatment.

Detailed Description

Patient must be between 18 and 65 years old and had an acute trauma with an AO type A3 burst fracture (a spinal injury where one of the bony parts of the spine \[vertebra\] breaks due to immediate and severe compression).

The purpose of this study is to compare surgery plus bracing versus bracing alone. Patients will be followed for 10 years. The investigators will compare patients' x-ray outcomes and clinical outcomes (i.e. how a patient is feeling and how a patient is able to do usual daily activities) as well as patients' immediate and delayed medical and surgical side effects between the 2 study arms. The goal of this study is to determine if treating patients with surgery plus bracing is better than just bracing alone.

Recruitment & Eligibility

Status
WITHDRAWN
Sex
All
Target Recruitment
Not specified
Inclusion Criteria
  1. Age 18-65 years
  2. Acute trauma patient with AO Type A3.1-A3.3 fractures of T10-L2
  3. Neurologically intact
  4. TLICS score of 4
  5. Women of childbearing potential must have a negative serum pregnancy test
Exclusion Criteria
  1. Severe poly-trauma (Injury Severity Score >15 and/or intubation required for > 24 hours)
  2. Sepsis and/or organ failure
  3. Prior instrumented arthrodesis of the thoracolumbar spine
  4. Severe co-morbidities (e.g., heart, respiratory, or renal disease)
  5. Recent history (<3 years) of concomitant spinal tumor or infection
  6. Greater than single level fracture involvement (other than transverse process fractures)
  7. AO Type A3 fracture with associated load sharing score ≥7
  8. ≥ 30 degrees regional kyphosis on standing
  9. History of autoimmune (seronegative) spondyloarthropathy (i.e., ankylosing spondylitis)
  10. History of osteoporosis
  11. Subjects who are pregnant or plan to become pregnant in the next 24 months. Patients will be advised on the use of contraceptives during this time. Methods include abstinence or two acceptable forms including condoms with spermicide, birth control pills, injections, or an IUD.
  12. Co-morbidity requiring medication that may interfere with bone or soft tissue healing (i.e., oral or parenteral glucocorticoids, NSAIDs immunosuppressive agents, methotrexate)
  13. Severe morbid obesity (BMI > 40)
  14. History of metal sensitivity/foreign body sensitivity
  15. History of prior laminectomy at the fracture site
  16. Associated scoliotic (> 10°) or pre-existing thoracolumbar kyphotic deformity
  17. History of substance abuse (recreational drugs, prescription drugs or alcohol) that could interfere with protocol assessments and/or with the subject's ability to complete the protocol required follow-up
  18. Prisoner

Study & Design

Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Study Design
PARALLEL
Arm && Interventions
GroupInterventionDescription
Surgery + Bracing vs. Bracing AloneSurgery + Bracing vs. Bracing AloneRandomize between 2 treatments: Treatment 1: Surgery + Bracing Treatment 2: Bracing alone
Patient's choicePatient's ChoicePatient will decide which group is best for him/her. The patient will be followed at the same points as Group 1.
Primary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
Compare radiologic outcomes using regional kyphosis and Evaluate clinical outcomes using questionnaires2 years

Primary Outcome is to compare radiologic and clinical outcomes. These will be measured by regional kyphosis, at 2 years following either non-operative or operative management of thoracolumbar AO type A3.1, A3.2, A3.3 fractures in neurologically-intact patients; and Oswestry Disability Index, at 2 years following either non-operative or operative management of thoracolumbar AO type A3.1, A3.2, A3.3 fractures in neurologically-intact patients.

Secondary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
Compare radiologic outcomes using regional kyphosis5 and 10 years

Secondary outcome is to compare radiologic outcomes, as measured by regional kyphosis, at 5 and 10 years following either non-operative or operative management of thoracolumbar AO type A3.1, A3.2, A3.3 fractures in neurologically-intact patients

Evaluate clinical outcomes using questionnaires5 and 10 years

Secondary outcome is to evaluate clinical outcomes, as measured by the Oswestry Disability Index, at 5 and 10 years following either non-operative or operative management of thoracolumbar AO type A3.1, A3.2, A3.3 fractures in neurologically-intact patients.

Compare global sagittal balance at 3 different time points2,5, and 10 years

Secondary Outcome is to compare global sagittal balance at 2, 5, and 10 years.

Collect data on patient in both groups for 10 years10 years

Secondary Outcome is to record frequency and time to secondary surgical intervention among patients in the bracing group.

Compare Return to work rates over a two year peiord3 month, 1 year, and 2 years

Secondary Outcome is to Compare return-to-work rates at 3 months, 1 year, and 2 years following either non-operative or operative management of thoracolumbar AO type A3.1, A3.2, A3.3 fractures in neurologically-intact patients.

Compare Health Care Cost between both groups over 10 years10 years

Secondary Outcome is to compare health care cost and utilization through extended follow-up period.

Trial Locations

Locations (1)

The Ohio State Unviersity

🇺🇸

Columbus, Ohio, United States

© Copyright 2025. All Rights Reserved by MedPath