MedPath

Effect of Balint Group on Burnout and Self-efficacy of Nurse Leaders in China: A Randomised Controlled Trial

Not Applicable
Completed
Conditions
Burnout
Self Efficacy
Interventions
Other: Balint group activities
Registration Number
NCT05716828
Lead Sponsor
Peking University People's Hospital
Brief Summary

Background: Burnout is common among nurses and is related to negative outcomes of medical care. This study aimed to explore the effectiveness of Balint group activities in burnout reduction among nurse leaders in a Chinese hospital.

Methods: This was a randomised controlled trial with a pre- and post-test. A total of 80 nurse leaders were randomly assigned to either a Balint group (n=40) or a non-Balint group (n=40). Participants in the Balint group completed Balint training for a period of three months. Participants in both groups completed the Maslach Burnout Inventory-Human Services Survey (MBI) and the General Self-Efficacy Scale (GSES) at the beginning and end of the study(three months later ). Balint group members also completed the Group Climate Questionnaire-Short Format the end of the study(three months later ).

Detailed Description

Not available

Recruitment & Eligibility

Status
COMPLETED
Sex
All
Target Recruitment
40
Inclusion Criteria
  1. nurse leaders in clinical departments
  2. voluntary participation
Exclusion Criteria

a. previous participation in Balint groups

Study & Design

Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Study Design
SINGLE_GROUP
Arm && Interventions
GroupInterventionDescription
Balint groupBalint group activitiesParticipants in the Balint group completed Balint training for a period of three months.
Primary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
Maslach Burnout Inventory-Human Services Survey (MBI-HSS) subscale depersonalization (MBI-DP)The second time for participants in both groups was assessed the MBI-DP questionnaire through Balint group activities completion, 3 months later

Maslach Burnout Inventory-Human Services Survey (MBI-HSS) includes 22 items across three domains: emotional exhaustion (EE; 9 items), depersonalization (DP; 5 items), and personal accomplishment (PA; 8 items). The scoring range for each item is 0 (never felt) to 6 (felt every day). The DP subscale measures unsympathetic and impersonal response to patients, and is regarded as a form of alienation.

Maslach Burnout Inventory-Human Services Survey (MBI-HSS) subscale emotional exhaustion (MBI-EE)The second time for participants in both groups was assessed the MBI-EE questionnaire through Balint group activities completion, 3 months later

Maslach Burnout Inventory-Human Services Survey (MBI-HSS) includes 22 items across three domains: emotional exhaustion (EE; 9 items), depersonalization (DP; 5 items), and personal accomplishment (PA; 8 items). The scoring range for each item is 0 (never felt) to 6 (felt every day). The EE subscale evaluates the feeling of excessive emotional stress and exhaustion due to work, which is characterized by mental, emotional, and physical exhaustion

Maslach Burnout Inventory-Human Services Survey (MBI-HSS) subscale personal accomplishment (MBI- PA)The second time for participants in both groups was assessed the MBI-PA questionnaire through Balint group activities completion, 3 months later

Maslach Burnout Inventory-Human Services Survey (MBI-HSS) includes 22 items across three domains: emotional exhaustion (EE; 9 items), depersonalization (DP; 5 items), and personal accomplishment (PA; 8 items). The scoring range for each item is 0 (never felt) to 6 (felt every day). The PA subscale assesses work-related ability and sense of accomplishment .

Secondary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
The General Self-Efficacy Scale (GSES)The second time for participants in both groups was assessed the GSES questionnaire through Balint group activities completion, 3 months later

The General Self-Efficacy Scale (GSES) is a 10-item scale used to measure individuals' overall self-confidence in dealing with different environmental challenges or unprecedented situations. Participants are asked to rate 10 questions by choosing one of four response options: 1 (completely incorrect), 2 (almost incorrect), 3 (relatively correct), or 4 (completely correct). A higher score indicates a higher level of general self-efficacy.

Trial Locations

Locations (1)

Shan Qu

🇨🇳

Beijing, Beijing, China

© Copyright 2025. All Rights Reserved by MedPath