Early Warning and Classification Model for Acute Non-traumatic Chest Pain
- Conditions
- Chest Pain
- Interventions
- Combination Product: Clinical evaluation, laboratory and cardiac imaging results, medication, surgery, and any hospitalization
- Registration Number
- NCT06196307
- Lead Sponsor
- Xiao-nan He
- Brief Summary
Acute non-traumatic chest pain is one of the common causes of presentation in emergency patients, but the causes of acute non-traumatic chest pain are complex, the severity of the condition varies greatly, and the specificity of symptoms is not high. Machine learning and intelligent auxiliary models can greatly shorten the time of clinical decision-making, and improve the accuracy of etiological diagnosis in patients with chest pain, reduce the rate of misdiagnosis and missed diagnosis, and provide a clear direction for further treatment.
- Detailed Description
Prospective observational studies used outpatient and follow-up information to construct an auxiliary early warning model of acute non-traumatic chest pain based on federated learning, and optimized the accuracy of early warning models through retrospective and prospective studies of large cohort data, and established an efficient and stable early warning and classification model for acute non-traumatic chest pain.
Recruitment & Eligibility
- Status
- RECRUITING
- Sex
- All
- Target Recruitment
- 188
- older than 18 years old;
- provided written informed consent;
- Outpatient visits in the pilot hospitals from June 2022 to December 2022
- did not provide written informed consent and were unwilling to be followed up;
- traumatic chest pain;
- systemic pain caused by malignant tumors or rheumatic diseases involving the chest;
- transferred patients;
- sudden death or death during hospital treatment;
- women who are known to be pregnant or lactating;
- have participated in other clinical trials within 3 months before enrolling in this trial or are currently participating in other clinical trials The lender;
- According to the investigator's judgment, the patient was unable to complete the study or comply with the requirements of the study;
- Patients were lost to follow-up.
Study & Design
- Study Type
- OBSERVATIONAL
- Study Design
- Not specified
- Arm && Interventions
Group Intervention Description No cardiovascular adverse events (MACE) occurred during the 1-month period Clinical evaluation, laboratory and cardiac imaging results, medication, surgery, and any hospitalization No cardiovascular adverse events (MACE),which include all-cause death, myocardial infarction, emergency revascularization, cardiogenic shock, cardiac arrest/ventricular fibrillation, stroke, and so on. Follow-up visits are conducted by in-person or telephone and registration is carried out. Group of cardiovascular adverse events (MACE) occurring during 1 month Clinical evaluation, laboratory and cardiac imaging results, medication, surgery, and any hospitalization Cardiovascular adverse events occur, the rest of the same as in the previous group
- Primary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method Ecg findings of myocardial infarction, inverted T wave or soaring T wave, ST segment elevation, pathological Q wave, etc. Baseline and week 12 Whether the patient has obvious abnormal ECG findings, such as myocardial infarction, conduction block. After coronary artery occlusion, three types of patterns of ischemia, injury and necrosis may appear successively on the electrocardiogram (ECG) over time. These changes of ECG patterns had obvious regional characteristics.
Myocardial injury marker level (cTn/CK-MB/MYO) level Baseline and week 12 Myocardial injury markers refer to the proteins and/or enzymes that are released into peripheral blood and detected when myocardial injury occurs. The detection of these substances may be helpful for clinical diagnosis, disease monitoring and risk stratification of acute myocardial infarction and other diseases associated with myocardial injury.
Achieve HEART score levels 7-10 (high-risk patients) ratio. Baseline and week 12 Myocardial infarction is often accompanied by severe chest pain symptoms, so a higher pain grade is considered as the clinical outcome
Incidence of cardiovascular events (CV death, all-cause death, fatal MI, nonfatal stroke). Week 12 The usefulness of the experimental method was evaluated retrospectively by the incidence of cardiovascular events.
- Secondary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method
Trial Locations
- Locations (1)
Xiaonan He
🇨🇳Beijing, Chaoyang, China