MedPath

Comparison of Peri Implant Soft Tissue Esthetics With Immediate Temporization With and Without Subepithelial Connective Tissue Graft

Phase 3
Conditions
Immediate Temporization and Soft Tissue Augmentation Around Delayed Implants
Interventions
Procedure: delayed implant placement with immediate provisionalization
Procedure: delayed implant with immediate provisionaliztion and soft tissue graft
Registration Number
NCT03770975
Lead Sponsor
Cairo University
Brief Summary

The aim of this study is to clinically evaluate peri-implant soft tissue esthetics around single delayed implants in the esthetic zone.

Detailed Description

To compare the efficacy of soft tissue augmentation on the peri-implant soft tissue esthetics along with immediate temporization to immediate temporization only.

Population (P): patients with a single missing tooth in the esthetic zone Intervention (I): Delayed implant placement with immediate temporization and subepithelial connective tissue graft Comparator (C): Delayed implant placement with immediate temporization Primary outcome: Pink esthetic score (PES) Time frame: 6 months Study design: Randomized controlled clinical trial

Recruitment & Eligibility

Status
UNKNOWN
Sex
All
Target Recruitment
22
Inclusion Criteria
  1. Age > 18 years old
  2. Good medical and psychological health
  3. Absence of untreated caries lesions and untreated/uncontrolled periodontal disease. If patients required periodontal treatment (non-surgical and/or surgical), this was arranged outside the study protocol and completed at least 30 days prior to the enrolment
  4. Need of a single-tooth replacement in the aesthetic (incisor, canine or premolar) region
  5. Willingness to sign the informed consent form
Exclusion Criteria
  1. Any known disease (not including controlled diabetes mellitus), infections or recent surgical procedures within 30 days of study initiation;
  2. Chronic treatment (i.e., 2 weeks or more) with any medication known to affect oral status (e.g., phenytoin, dihydropyridine, calcium antagonists and cyclosporine) within 1 month before baseline visit;
  3. Anticoagulant therapy with warfarin, clopidogrel, ticlopidine or once daily aspirin (more than 81 mg);
  4. HIV or Hepatitis;
  5. Physical handicaps that would interfere with the ability to perform adequate oral hygiene;
  6. Alcoholism or chronic drug abuse;
  7. Heavy smokers (>10/cigarettes per day);
  8. Lack of adequate primary stability at implant insertion that enables immediate provisionalization (insertion torque ca 30 Ncm).

Study & Design

Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Study Design
PARALLEL
Arm && Interventions
GroupInterventionDescription
Implant with immediate temporization and soft tissue graftdelayed implant placement with immediate provisionalizationSingle delayed implant placement in the esthetic zone with placing a subepithelial connective tissue graft buccal to the implant and immediate temporary crown within 48 hours after the surgery
Delayed implant placement with immediate provisionalizationdelayed implant with immediate provisionaliztion and soft tissue graftSingle delayed implant placement in the esthetic zone with placing an immediate temporary crown placed within 48 hours after the surgery
Primary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
Pink Esthetic Score3 months post definitive prosthesis

Pink esthetic score evaluates the soft tissue esthetics around implant supported crowns. Using a 0-1-2 scoring system, 0 being the lowest, 2 being the highest value. The maximum achievable PES is 14. 7 variables are measured: mesial and distal papillae being 0 if absent, 1 if incomplete and 2 if complete. Alveolar process, soft tissue level, contour, texture and color being 0 if major discrepancy, 1 if minor discrepancy and 2 if matches the contralateral

Secondary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
Buccal peri-implant soft tissue thickness3 months post definitive

the soft tissue thickness buccal to the implant by using an anesthesia needle and digital caliper

Patient satisfaction by Visual analogue scale (VAS)3 months post definitive

Patient satisfaction will be evaluated using a questionnaire which is based on a visual analog scale (VAS). A horizontal VAS bar, 100 mm long, with the right anchor labeled "much less than natural teeth" which is marked by zero and the left anchor labeled "much more" which is marked by 10 will be used. Five questions will be formulated to record the patients' satisfaction in terms of functionality and from an esthetic point of view. Participants will look in a mirror and also be viewed a photograph before recording their answers on the horizontal calibrated line.

Recession of the buccal peri-implant mucosa3 months post definitive

measured at the apical zenith of the mucosal margin on the implants after digital superimposition of the optically scanned models as the vertical distance change between the former and the new position of soft tissue margins.

Trial Locations

Locations (1)

Faculty of Dentistry, Cairo University

🇪🇬

Cairo, Egypt

© Copyright 2025. All Rights Reserved by MedPath