Comparison of two approaches to rebuilding gum tissue around dental implants
- Conditions
- Peri-implant soft tissue defects treatmentOral Health
- Registration Number
- ISRCTN10502178
- Lead Sponsor
- Damascus University
- Brief Summary
Not available
- Detailed Description
Not available
Recruitment & Eligibility
- Status
- Completed
- Sex
- All
- Target Recruitment
- 15
1. Patients with bilateral soft tissue recession peri-implant =2mm
2. Thin gingival biotype
3. Age =20 years old
4. No probing depths =5mm
5. Healthy implants measured by the lack of periimplantitis and mucositis
6. Good oral hygiene
1. Unstable systemic diseases
2. Compromised immune system
3. Unstable bleeding disorders
4. History of radiation or cancer in the oral cavity
5. Use of intra-venous bisphosphonate or steroid medication
6. Use of tobacco products (1/2 pack per day)
7. Pregnant or breastfeeding women
8. Previous mucogingival surgery or implant placement within the past 6 months
9. Bone defects requiring grafting
10. Bad oral hygiene
Study & Design
- Study Type
- Interventional
- Study Design
- Not specified
- Primary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method Recession depth at 2 weeks, month, 3 months measured using a periodontal probe
- Secondary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method <br> 1. Width and thickness of keratinized tissued measured using a periodontal probe at baseline and 3 months<br> 2. Percentage of implant coverage measured using a periodontal probe at baseline and 3 months<br> 3. Recession width measured using a periodontal probe at baseline and 3 months<br> 4. Color and texture of treatment sites, ‘‘equal or not equal to surrounding native tissue’’ through visual observation and palpation at 2 weeks, months, and 3 months.<br> 5. Subject esthetic satisfaction, (‘‘unsatisfied’’ to ‘‘very satisfied’’) on a five-point scale at 3 months<br> 6. Subject pain or discomfort (‘‘no pain’’ to ‘‘extreme pain’’) on 10-cm visual analog scales at 2 hours, 24hrs, 48hrs, 72hrs and 1 week.<br>