The Impact of Thoracic Paravertebral Nerve Block At Different Positions on Pain Relief in Patients Undergoing Single-Port Thoracoscopic Partial Lung Resection
- Conditions
- Lung NodulesLung Cancer
- Registration Number
- NCT06789276
- Lead Sponsor
- Second Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University
- Brief Summary
Thoracic surgery is widely recognized as one of the most painful surgical procedures. Compared to open thoracotomy, video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS) offers similar therapeutic outcomes with less invasiveness, significantly reducing postoperative pain and promoting recovery. Despite the use of video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS), a significant proportion of patients still experience considerable discomfort. Specifically, 78% of patients report moderate to severe pain, with 27% experiencing moderate pain, 34% severe pain, and 17% very severe pain.
Multiple studies have shown that the use of regional anesthesia, such as thoracic paravertebral nerve block (TPVB), in these surgeries can block the transmission of nociceptive signals via the intercostal nerves, producing good analgesic effects. This can reduce the consumption of postoperative opioids, decrease inflammatory responses, and improve patient survival rates after surgery.
By comparing the differences in hemodynamic parameters, inflammatory stress indicators, and intraoperative and postoperative analgesic effects of thoracic paravertebral nerve block in different preoperative positions for patients undergoing thoracoscopic surgery, we aim to identify the optimal nerve block position, thereby promoting patient recovery.
- Detailed Description
Not available
Recruitment & Eligibility
- Status
- NOT_YET_RECRUITING
- Sex
- All
- Target Recruitment
- 200
-
Age ≥ 18 and ≤ 70 years old
-
BMI ≥ 18 and ≤ 28
- American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) physical status classification I-II ⑷ Patients scheduled for elective thoracoscopic lung resection (including lobectomy, segmentectomy, and wedge resection) ⑸ Patients who agree to participate in this study and sign the informed consent form
-
-
Patients who refuse to undergo nerve block
-
Patients with severe cardiac, pulmonary, hepatic, or renal insufficiency requiring postoperative admission to the ICU for continued treatment (EF < 40%, FEV1/FVC < 40%)
-
Abnormal coagulation function ⑷ History of allergy to anesthetic drugs
- History of chronic alcohol use, chronic pain, or long-term use of psychotropic medications ⑹ Scars, infections, or tumors at the puncture site ⑺ History or family history of malignant hyperthermia ⑻ Refusal to participate in this study or inability to cooperate with follow-up or poor compliance
-
-
Termination criteria:
-
Failure to comply with the predetermined study protocol ⑵ Occurrence of local anesthetic adverse reactions, puncture needle entering the pleural cavity, or other complications during puncture
- Changes in the patient's condition ⑷ The patient's unwillingness to continue participating in the study
Study & Design
- Study Type
- INTERVENTIONAL
- Study Design
- PARALLEL
- Primary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method Using the Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) scores to assess the postoperative analgesic effect in patients For each patient enrolled in the study, data collection will commence at the time of enrollment and continue through to 48 hours postoperatively. The timeframe for conducting data analysis and reporting will be capped at one year. The primary outcome is to assess the patients' pain levels at 1h, 2h, 8h, 12h, 24h, and 48h postoperatively, as well as the analgesic efficacy of the nerve block, using the Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) scores for static (lying or sitting) and dynamic (coughing) conditions.
The Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) is a simple and effective tool for assessing the intensity of pain, widely used in clinical settings and research. The NRS score is determined by asking patients to select a number between 0 and 10 to represent their level of pain, where 0 indicates no pain and 10 indicates the most severe pain. Specifically, 0 represents no pain, 1-3 represents mild pain, 4-6 represents moderate pain, and 7-10 represents severe pain.
- Secondary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method Using the postoperative opioid consumption to assess the postoperative analgesic effect in patients. For each enrolled patient,data collection will commence at the time of enrollment and continue through to 24 hours postoperatively. The period for data analysis and reporting will not exceed one year. The secondary outcome is to assess the total amount of opioids (such as sufentanil) used by patients within 24 hours postoperatively.
By comparing the opioid consumption between two groups of patients, it is possible to determine which treatment plan is more effective in controlling postoperative pain. The amount of opioid consumption can indirectly reflect the postoperative recovery status of patients. Lower consumption generally indicates better pain control and better recovery. Reducing the use of opioids can decrease the incidence of adverse reactions such as postoperative nausea, vomiting, and respiratory depression, thereby improving the postoperative quality of life of patients.
Related Research Topics
Explore scientific publications, clinical data analysis, treatment approaches, and expert-compiled information related to the mechanisms and outcomes of this trial. Click any topic for comprehensive research insights.
Trial Locations
- Locations (1)
The Second Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University
🇨🇳Suzhou, Jiangsu, China
The Second Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University🇨🇳Suzhou, Jiangsu, ChinaYifang ZhuContact0086+13913193146sdfeyjg@163.com