Skip to main content
Clinical Trials/NCT03090555
NCT03090555CompletedNot Applicable

The Effectiveness of Translational Manipulation Under Interscalene Block for Treatment of Adhesive Capsulitis of the Shoulder: A Randomized Clinical Trial

Daniel G. Rendeiro2 sites in 1 country18 target enrollmentStarted: January 5, 2004Last updated:
Conditions

Trial Snapshot

Phase
Not Applicable
Status
Completed
Sponsor
Enrollment
18
Locations
2
Primary Endpoint
Change in Shoulder Pain and Disability Index (SPADI)

Study Overview

Brief Summary

This study evaluates the addition of translational manipulation under interscalene block, to a course of orthopaedic manual physical therapy for treatment of adhesive capsulitis of the shoulder. Half the patients will receive a translational manipulation under interscalene block, plus 6 sessions of orthopaedic manual physical therapy. The other half will receive 7 sessions of physical therapy. The investigators hypothesize that the translational manipulation under interscalene block will provide additional benefit beyond the effect of in-clinic orthopaedic manual physical therapy alone.

Detailed Description

Both translational manipulation under interscalene block and in-clinic orthopaedic manual physical therapy are thought to be useful for treating adhesive capsulitis of the shoulder. However, no single intervention for this condition has been proven to be superior to others.

The translational manipulation under interscalene block may improve pain-free motion of the involved shoulder, by releasing tight tissue without the guarding and motion-limiting effect of active muscle tension. The interscalene block prevents the patient from actively contracting the muscles that control the involved shoulder, during the manipulation procedure.

One additional possible benefit of the translational manipulation under interscalene block, is that the technique loads the joint structures--bone, joint capsule--in a safer way with less angular torque than conventional/traditional manipulation under anaesthesia. This minimizes the risk of physical/mechanical harm from the procedure.

Study Design

Study Type
Interventional
Allocation
Non Randomized
Intervention Model
Parallel
Primary Purpose
Treatment
Masking
Single (Outcomes Assessor)

Masking Description

Outcomes assessors are blinded to the study arm to which participants are assigned

Eligibility Criteria

Ages
18 Years to — (Adult, Older Adult)
Sex
All
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No

Inclusion Criteria

  • Military healthcare system beneficiaries 18 years old or older
  • Chief complaint of loss of shoulder range of motion
  • Passive glenohumeral abduction less than 75 degrees
  • Sufficient English-language skills to understand the study protocol.

Exclusion Criteria

  • Clinical diagnosis of diabetes (type I or II)
  • Clinically evident and symptomatic rotator cuff tear or cervical radiculopathy
  • Pain as the primary impairment (versus limitation of motion as the primary impairment)
  • Having contraindications to an interscalene block.

Outcomes

Primary Outcomes

Change in Shoulder Pain and Disability Index (SPADI)

Time Frame: baseline, 3 months, 6 months, 12 months, 48 months

Measure of individual pain and disability

Secondary Outcomes

  • Percent of normal(48 months)
  • Activity limitations(48 months)
  • Medication use(48 months)

Investigators

Sponsor
Daniel G. Rendeiro
Sponsor Class
Fed
Responsible Party
Sponsor Investigator
Principal Investigator

Daniel G. Rendeiro

Program Director

Brooke Army Medical Center

Study Sites (2)

Loading locations...

Similar Trials