跳至主要内容
临床试验/NCT00641563
NCT00641563已完成不适用

The Effects of Dexmedetomidine/Remifentanil and Midazolam/Remifentanil on Auditory-evoked Potentials and Electroencephalogram at Light-to-moderate Sedation Levels in Healthy Subjects

Insel Gruppe AG, University Hospital Bern1 个研究点 分布在 1 个国家目标入组 10 人开始时间: 2004年3月最近更新:
适应症
干预措施
相关药物

试验速览

阶段
不适用
状态
已完成
入组人数
10
试验地点
1
主要终点
Amplitudes (in Micro Volts) of Acoustic Event Related Potentials (Time-locked Amplitudes in the Electroencephalogram 100 Milliseconds After the Acoustic Stimulus, Averaged Over 40 Stimuli)Awake and at 3 Different Drug-induced Sedation Levels

研究概览

简要总结

Sedation may be necessary in intensive care to facilitate diverse therapeutic interventions, but the use of sedative drugs may increase the risk of delirium and long-term cognitive impairment. Thus the implementation and monitoring of sedation remains difficult despite the use of sedation protocols and clinical sedation scores. Attempts to improve sedation monitoring through the use of the electroencephalogram(EEG) have been disappointing. Derived variables based on the unstimulated EEG fail to predict the response to external stimuli at the clinically most relevant light-to-moderate sedation levels, and the overlap between moderate and deep sedation levels is wide. We have demonstrated that long-latency auditory evoked potentials (ERPs)can be used to avoid deep levels of sedation in healthy volunteers during propofol sedation, independent of the concomitant administration of remifentanil. This approach has a potential clinical application for improved monitoring of sedation. Since the effects of different sedative drugs on the EEG may vary widely, the use of ERPs to monitor sedation needs to be evaluated with different sedative drugs. Therefore we will administer two widely used drug combinations (dexmedetomidine/remifentanil and midazolam/remifentanil) in healthy volunteers and record ERPS and processed EEG during clinical relevant sedation levels

详细描述

Sedation may be necessary in intensive care to facilitate diverse therapeutic interventions, but the use of sedative drugs may increase the risk of delirium and long-term cognitive impairment. Thus the implementation and monitoring of sedation remains difficult despite the use of sedation protocols and clinical sedation scores. Attempts to improve sedation monitoring through the use of the electroencephalogram (EEG) have been disappointing. Derived variables based on the unstimulated EEG fail to predict the response to external stimuli at the clinically most relevant light-to-moderate sedation levels, and the overlap between moderate and deep sedation levels is wide. We have demonstrated that long-latency auditory evoked potentials (ERPs)can be used to avoid deep levels of sedation in healthy volunteers during propofol sedation, independent of the concomitant administration of remifentanil. This approach has a potential clinical application for improved monitoring of sedation. Since the effects of different sedative drugs on the EEG may vary widely, the use of ERPs to monitor sedation needs to be evaluated with different sedative drugs. The alpha-2 agonist dexmedetomidine (dex) has been approved for short-term sedation in surgical intensive care unit (ICU) patients. Preliminary data suggest that the risk of delirium may be substantially reduced when dexmedetomidine is used to produce sedation. Since dexmedetomidine acts via different receptors and brain areas than do benzodiazepines and propofol, its impact on the brain electrophysiology may also be different. The assessment of dexmedetomidine's effects on the EEG and ERPs at various sedation levels has been limited in humans. We hypothesized that the combinations DEXMEDETOMIDINE/REMIFANTANIL (dex/remi) and MIDAZOLAM/REMIFENTANIL (mida/remi) would induce the same changes in EEG and long-latency ERPs during light-to-moderate levels of sedation in healthy subjects, despite the different quality of sedation that they provide. The opioid remifentanil was added because virtually all patients in the ICU have some level of pain and receive an opioid analgesic in combination with a sedative. 10 healthy subjects were assessed with both drug combinations (dex/remi and mida/remi), at least 7 days apart. The sequence of the drug combinations were randomized.

研究设计

研究类型
Interventional
分配方式
Randomized
干预模型
Crossover
主要目的
Basic Science
盲法
None

入排标准

年龄范围
18 Years 至 40 Years(Adult)
性别
Male
接受健康志愿者

入选标准

  • age 18 years and older

排除标准

  • History of problems during anesthesia
  • Impairment of the auditory system

研究组 & 干预措施

Dex/Remi followed by Mida/Remi

Active Comparator

Sedation with dexmedetomidine and remifentanil followed by sedation with midazolam and remifentanil separated by one week

干预措施: Dexmedetomidine (Drug)

Dex/Remi followed by Mida/Remi

Active Comparator

Sedation with dexmedetomidine and remifentanil followed by sedation with midazolam and remifentanil separated by one week

干预措施: Midazolam (Drug)

Dex/Remi followed by Mida/Remi

Active Comparator

Sedation with dexmedetomidine and remifentanil followed by sedation with midazolam and remifentanil separated by one week

干预措施: Remifentanil (Drug)

Mida/Remi followed by Dexa/Remi

Active Comparator

Sedation with midazolam and remifentanil followed by sedation with dexmedetomidine and remifentanil separated by one week

干预措施: Dexmedetomidine (Drug)

Mida/Remi followed by Dexa/Remi

Active Comparator

Sedation with midazolam and remifentanil followed by sedation with dexmedetomidine and remifentanil separated by one week

干预措施: Midazolam (Drug)

Mida/Remi followed by Dexa/Remi

Active Comparator

Sedation with midazolam and remifentanil followed by sedation with dexmedetomidine and remifentanil separated by one week

干预措施: Remifentanil (Drug)

结局指标

主要结局

Amplitudes (in Micro Volts) of Acoustic Event Related Potentials (Time-locked Amplitudes in the Electroencephalogram 100 Milliseconds After the Acoustic Stimulus, Averaged Over 40 Stimuli)Awake and at 3 Different Drug-induced Sedation Levels

时间窗: awake + 3 sedation levels (RS2/3/4) (20 minutes each)

Event Related Potentials (time-locked amplitudes in the electroencephalogram 100 milliseconds after the acoustic stimulus, averaged over 40 stimuli) Sedation levels were graded with the Ramsay scale (RS), where the responses of patients to standardized increasing stimuli (voice, then prodding, the pain stimulus) are graded. The higher the number, the deeper is the sedation. RS 6 means no response at all (= anesthesia)

次要结局

  • BIS-Index Awake and 3 Sedation Levels (RS 2/3/4)(awake and 3 sedation levels (RS 2/3/4) 20 min each)

研究者

申办方类型
Other

研究点 (1)

Loading locations...

相似试验