MedPath

The Feasibility Study for Real-time Remote CT Reading for Suspected Acute Appendicitis Using iPhone

Not Applicable
Completed
Conditions
Telemedicine
Interventions
Device: Remote CT reading using the iPhone
Device: CT reading using LCD monitor
Registration Number
NCT02108717
Lead Sponsor
Hanyang University
Brief Summary

1. Purpose

- The investigators aim to evaluate the feasibility of iPhone based remote control system as a real-time remote CT reading tool for suspected appendicitis under 3G network and the suboptimal illumination.

2. Methods

* A total of 120 abdominal CT examinations; sixty had no findings of appendicitis, while the other sixty showed signs of acute appendicitis, were selected. The 16 raters reviewed these images using an LCD monitor of the PACS workstation and also an iPhone which was connected to the PACS workstation via remote control system, grading the probability of presence of acute appendicitis on each examination by a five Likert scale.

* The investigators will compare the diagnostic performance between two devices.

Detailed Description

The 16 raters were randomly divided into two groups

* The raters in group one reviewed the CT examinations numbered from one to 60 using LCD monitor and reviewed the remaining CT examinations numbered from 61 to 120 using iPhone with TeamViewer at their first visit

* The other group firstly reviewed the CT scans numbered from one to 60 using iPhone with TeamViewer and 61 to 120 with the LCD monitor.

* They visited twice with an interval of four weeks and reviewed the CT scans using revered devices at each session.

* The raters were instructed to rate the likelihood of the presence or absence of appendicitis in each case using a five-Likert scale (1 = obvious no appendicitis, 2 = unlikely appendicitis, 3 = unsure, 4 = likely appendicitis, 5 = obvious appendicitis).

Recruitment & Eligibility

Status
COMPLETED
Sex
Male
Target Recruitment
16
Inclusion Criteria
  • Board certified emergency physicians with a clinical experience of 5 years and over.
Exclusion Criteria
  • Corrected eyesight < 20/30
  • Color weakness or blindness

Study & Design

Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Study Design
CROSSOVER
Arm && Interventions
GroupInterventionDescription
Group IICT reading using LCD monitorThe raters in this group II firstly reviewed the CT scans numbered from one to 60 using iPhone with TeamViewer and 61 to 120 with the LCD monitor. They visited twice with an interval of four weeks and reviewed the CT scans using revered devices at each session.
Group IRemote CT reading using the iPhoneThe raters in this group one firstly reviewed the CT scans numbered from one to 60 using LCD monitor and after mandatory rests of 20 minutes, reviewed the remaining CT examinations numbered from 61 to 120 using iPhone with TeamViewer at their first visit. They visited twice with an interval of four weeks and reviewed the CT scans using revered devices at each session.
Group ICT reading using LCD monitorThe raters in this group one firstly reviewed the CT scans numbered from one to 60 using LCD monitor and after mandatory rests of 20 minutes, reviewed the remaining CT examinations numbered from 61 to 120 using iPhone with TeamViewer at their first visit. They visited twice with an interval of four weeks and reviewed the CT scans using revered devices at each session.
Group IIRemote CT reading using the iPhoneThe raters in this group II firstly reviewed the CT scans numbered from one to 60 using iPhone with TeamViewer and 61 to 120 with the LCD monitor. They visited twice with an interval of four weeks and reviewed the CT scans using revered devices at each session.
Primary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
Diagnostic performance between iPhone and LCD monitorwithin one day

* Dorfman-Berbaum-Metz method with RSCORE and semi-parametric estimation of ROC indices by using the DMB-MRMC software (version 2.3, available at http://perception.radiology.uiowa.edu)

* 95% confidence interval

* The reviewers and cases are taken as random factors

Diagnostic accuracy between the iPhone and the LCD monitorwithin one day

◆ Sensitivity, specificity

* gold standard: The pathology report and the results of clinical follow up

* grade 1, 2 and 3 = negative appendicitis findings

* grade 4 and 5 = positive appendicitis findings

* McNemar's test to compare the sensitivity and specificity between the iPhad and the LCD monitor

Secondary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod

Trial Locations

Locations (1)

Hanyang university guri hospital, Department of emergency medicine

🇰🇷

Guri, GyeongGido, Korea, Republic of

© Copyright 2025. All Rights Reserved by MedPath