CTRI/2022/09/045914
Not yet recruiting
未知
on invasive positive pressure ventilation with long and narrow tubing vs short binasal prongs in reducing the need for invasive mechanical ventilation in preterm neonates.
Overview
- Phase
- 未知
- Intervention
- Not specified
- Conditions
- Not specified
- Sponsor
- one
- Status
- Not yet recruiting
- Last Updated
- 3 years ago
Overview
Brief Summary
No summary available.
Investigators
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria
- •All inborn preterm neonates less than 34 weeks of gestation with respiratory distress syndrome.
Exclusion Criteria
- •Major congenital malformation
- •Severe perinatal asphyxia with 5 min Apgar score \<3
Outcomes
Primary Outcomes
Not specified
Similar Trials
Completed
Not Applicable
Comparing non-invasive respiratory support methods following surgery in neonates with risk of extubation failureExtubation failure in neonatesSurgeryExtubation failureISRCTN94827278The Great Orchestra of Christmas Charity (Poland)300
Active, not recruiting
Not Applicable
Effects of noninvasive mechanical ventilation in pulmonary function and functional capacity after cardiac surgery:A Randomized Controlled trialheart failure.C14.280.434RBR-7sqj78niverdidade Federal de São Paulo
Recruiting
Not Applicable
on Invasive Positive Pressure Ventilation (NIPPV) or conventional mechanical ventilation for neonatal respiratory failureRespiratory failureRespiratory - Other respiratory disorders / diseasesReproductive Health and Childbirth - Complications of newbornACTRN12613000346774Isfahan university of medical sciences50
Completed
Not Applicable
Influence of non-invasive positive pressure ventilation versus nasal high-frequency oscillation ventilation on parameters of oxygenation and ventilation in premature infants in the weaning phase after respiratory distress syndromeP22.0Respiratory distress syndrome of newbornDRKS00023438Menschen für Kinder e.V.24
Not yet recruiting
Phase 2
Comparison between two modes of ventilation in preterms who failed CPAPCTRI/2022/12/048106JSS hospital