Does Use of Letrozole in Controlled Ovarian Stimulation in Normal Ovarian Responder in Fresh Embryo Transfer IVF/ICSI Cycle Improve the Pregnancy Rate?

Letrozole, sold under the brand name Femara among others, is an aromatase inhibitor which is used in the treatment of hormonally-responsive breast cancer after surgery. Aromatase is a microsomal cytochrome P450 hemoprotein-containing enzyme that catalyzes the rate-limiting step in the production of estrogens: the conversion of androstenedione and testosterone via three hydroxylation steps to estrone and estradiol, respectively. It is a good target for selective inhibition because estrogen production is a terminal step in the biosynthetic sequence. Aromatase activity is present in many tissues, including the ovaries, brain, adipose tissue, muscle, liver, and breast. The investigators use letrozole as routine for patients of breast cancer who want to keep chance of fertility in the future before receiving chemotherapy which may do damage to their ovarian function. After they complete the treatment protocol of breast cancer, they can practice the fertility plan with these frozen embryos or oocytes.

Aromatase inhibitors are widely used as adjuvant endocrine therapy for postmenopausal women with breast cancer. They have been used off-label in the treatment of patients for increasing the number of ovarian follicles recruited in ovulatory women undergoing controlled ovarian hyperstimulation (COH).

A shorter half-life (48 hours) which would predict a lower risk of teratogenicity. No direct antiestrogenic adverse effects on the endometrium, due to an absence of peripheral estrogen receptor blockade and the shorter half-life. In a previous report, the addition of letrozole to gonadotropins (compared with gonadotropins alone) during IVF resulted in a greater number of oocytes and blastocysts, similar pregnancy rates, and no increased risk of ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome.

According to the current guidelines for the treatment course of IVF in NTUH (National Taiwan University Hospital), fresh embryo transfer (ET) cycle is considered for patients who have poor ovarian response because of its low risk of ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome (OHSS). Patients who have high response to ovarian stimulation with freezing all the embryos should be the best policy for avoiding high risk of OHSS and have the advantage of increasing the cumulative pregnancy rate. For ovarian normal responders, instead of hCG, luteal support with exogenous progesterone supplementation is the standard protocol for patients who received fresh embryo transfer for avoiding the risk of OHSS. In other normal responders who have increasing risk of OHSS, the strategy of freezing all embryos are more favored.

In a prospective study had shown that in the population of ovarian normal responder, the cryopreservation group has a higher clinical pregnancy rate per ET transfer (84% vs 54.7%) compared to fresh ET group. The implantation rates were 70.8% and 38.9%, respectively. The ongoing pregnancy rates per transfer (at 10 weeks' gestation) were 78.0% and 50.9%, respectively. The attributable risk percentage of implantation failure due to reduced endometrial receptivity in the fresh group was 64.7%.