MedPath

MEDITOXIN® Treatment in Subjects With Post-Stroke Upper Limb Spasticity

Phase 4
Completed
Conditions
Spasticity, Muscle
Interventions
Registration Number
NCT03908580
Lead Sponsor
Medy-Tox
Brief Summary

This study is "A Prospective, Multi-center, Single Arm, Open-label, Phase IV Clinical Trial to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of MEDITOXIN® in Treatment of Post Stroke Upper Limb Spasticity".

Detailed Description

Not available

Recruitment & Eligibility

Status
COMPLETED
Sex
Female
Target Recruitment
120
Inclusion Criteria
  1. Male or female over 20 years.
  2. Subjects that was diagnosed with stroke at least 1 month before participating in the clinical trial.
  3. Subjects with MAS score of ≥2 for local muscle spasticity of wrist flexor.
Exclusion Criteria
  1. Subjects with generalized neuromuscular junction disorder (ex: myasthenia gravis, Lambert-Eaton syndrome, amyotrophic lateral sclerosis, etc.).
  2. Subjects with fixed joint, muscle contracture, or atrophy in the treatment area.
  3. Subjects with botulinum toxin treatment within 3 months before administration of the investigational product.
  4. Known immunization or hypersensitivity to any botulinum toxin preparations.
  5. Subjects who have recieved the following treatments within 4 weeks from screening: Muscle relaxants, Benzodiazepines, Aminoglycosides, Other antibiotics, Anticholinergics

Study & Design

Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Study Design
SINGLE_GROUP
Arm && Interventions
GroupInterventionDescription
Meditoxin®MeditoxinBotulinum toxin type A was intramuscularly injected up to 360U and up to 4 sites, depending on the muscle size.
Primary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
Change in muscle tone determined by MAS (Modified Ashworth Scale) of wrist flexor4 weeks

Change in muscle tone determined by MAS (Modified Ashworth Scale: Measures resistance during passive soft-tissue stretching; score 0 to 4, 4 being most difficult passive movement) of wrist flexor in subjects with post stroke upper limb spasticity at week 4 after administration compared to baseline.

Secondary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
Change in muscle tone determined by MAS (Modified Ashworth Scale) of elbow flexor and finger flexor4 weeks, 16 weeks, and 4 weeks after re-visit

Change in muscle tone determined by MAS (Modified Ashworth Scale: Measures resistance during passive soft-tissue stretching; score 0 to 4, 4 being most difficult passive movement) of elbow flexor and finger flexor at week 4 and 16 after administration compared to baseline, and at 4 weeks after re-administration compared to the time of re-visit.

Change in muscle tone determined by MAS (Modified Ashworth Scale) of wrist flexor16 weeks, and 4 weeks after re-visit

Change in muscle tone determined by MAS (Modified Ashworth Scale: Measures resistance during passive soft-tissue stretching; score 0 to 4, 4 being most difficult passive movement) of wrist flexor at week 16 after administration compared to baseline, and at 4 weeks after re-administration compared to the time of re-visit.

The effective rate of wrist flexor, elbow flexor, and finger flexor4 weeks, 16 weeks, and 4 weeks after re-visit

The effective rate of wrist flexor, elbow flexor, and finger flexor at week 4 and 16 compared to baseline and at week 4 after re-administration compared to re-visit, defining the muscle with MAS (Modified Ashworth Scale: Measures resistance during passive soft-tissue stretching; score 0 to 4, 4 being most difficult passive movement) score of ≥1 among the wrist flexor, elbow flexor, and finger flexor muscles as responders when the MAS is reduced by 1 score compared to baseline (week 0).

Change in DAS (Disability Assessment Scale) score4 weeks, 16 weeks, and 4 weeks after re-visit

Change in score of goal assessment section in DAS (Disability Assessment Scale: Measures disability associated with upper limb spasticity in patients; score 0 to 3, 3 being the most severe disability) at week 4 and 16 compared to baseline and at week 4 after re-administration compared to re-visit.

Change in QOL (SF-36v2; Quality of Life) score4 weeks, 16 weeks, and 4 weeks after re-visit

Change in score of Short Form 36 ver.2 (SF-36v2; Quality of Life, QOL: a questionnaire with 36 questions regarding general health change affecting patient's quality of life; score from 1 up to 5, from minimum to high impact on quality of life) at week 4 and 16 compared to baseline and at week 4 after re-administration compared to re-visit.

Subject's or caregiver's global assessment4 weeks, 16 weeks, and 4 weeks after re-visit

Subject's or caregiver's global assessment (rating from -3 to +3 on the overall treatment effect, with +3 being very satisfied with treatment) at week 4 and 16 compared to baseline and at week 4 after re-administration compared to re-visit.

Number of participants with Adverse Events (AEs) to assess safety of investigational product.Through study completion, an average of 1 year

Safety of IP assessed by the number of partiicipants with adverse events determined by MedDra ver 16.0 from enrollment to the end of study.

© Copyright 2025. All Rights Reserved by MedPath