Comparing the Retention of two Pit and Fissure sealants which are effective in presence of water and effective in absence of water in Permanent First Molar Teeth after 3, 6, and 9 months
Not Applicable
- Conditions
- Health Condition 1: A488- Other specified bacterial diseases
- Registration Number
- CTRI/2019/08/020737
- Lead Sponsor
- Oma Gyati
- Brief Summary
Not available
- Detailed Description
Not available
Recruitment & Eligibility
- Status
- Closed to Recruitment of Participants
- Sex
- Not specified
- Target Recruitment
- 0
Inclusion Criteria
1. Children ready to comply with the study protocol
2. Children in age group of 6 â?? 9 years
3. All fully-erupted non-carious permanent first molars
4. Children with good general health
5. At least one pair of bilateral maxillary or mandibular caries free permanent first molars.
6. No history of any preventive dental treatment from last 6 months on the respective teeth
7. Patient at high risk of developing caries as per American Academy of Pediatric Dentistry (AAPD) criteria.
Exclusion Criteria
1. Medically compromised children
2. Children with hypoplastic teeth
3. Partially erupted permanent first molars
4. Uncooperative children
5. Children with carious molars
Study & Design
- Study Type
- Interventional
- Study Design
- Not specified
- Primary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method Hydrophilic pit and fissure sealants will show significantly higher retention rates and better marginal integrity as compared to Hydrophobic sealants after 9 months in permanent first molars. <br/ ><br>Timepoint: 9 Months
- Secondary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method To evaluate and compare the retention rates and marginal integrity of Hydrophilic and Hydrophobic pit and fissure sealants in permanent first molars at 3, 6, and 9 months. <br/ ><br> <br/ ><br>To evaluate the caries incidence after application of pit and fissure sealants at 3, 6, and 9 months. <br/ ><br>Timepoint: 16-05-2020