Comparison of the AMBU Aura-i and LMA Supreme supraglottic airway devices in spontaneously breathing anaesthetised patients

Phase 4

Completed

• Conditions: Performance of airway device; Spontaneously breathing anaesthetised females undergoing minor gynaeocological procedures; Anaesthesiology - Anaesthetics

• Registration Number: ACTRN12614000032651
• Lead Sponsor: Dr Wendy H.L. Teoh

Brief Summary

Not available

Detailed Description

Not available

Study Timeline

• Results First Posted: 1900-01-01
• Study Start: 2014-01-10
• Last Update Posted: 13 January 2020

Recruitment & Eligibility

• Status: Completed
• Sex: Female
• Target Recruitment: 100

Inclusion Criteria

One hundred ASA I- II patients scheduled for elective minor gynaecological and breast procedures in our women's hospital

Exclusion Criteria

ASA physical status III or IV; BMI equal to and greater than 40 kg/m2, those with predicted difficult airway; high risk of regurgitation or aspiration; and respiratory tract pathology (including preoperative sore throat).

Study & Design

• Study Type: Interventional
• Study Design: Not specified

Primary Outcome Measures

Name	Time	Method
The time taken to establish effective ventilation.This is the interval from when the Ambu Aura-i or LMA Supreme entered the mouth to the first capnograph trace.[After the Ambu Aura-i or LMA Supreme airway device has been inserted into the participant's mouth.]