Skip to main content
Clinical Trials/NCT04573413
NCT04573413UnknownNot Applicable

Efficacy of Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation (r-TMS) Combined With Visual Scanning Treatment on Cognitive-behavioral Symptoms of Unilateral Spatial Neglect in Patients With Traumatic Brain Injury: a Randomized Clinical Trial

Azienda Usl di Bologna2 sites in 1 country28 target enrollmentStarted: March 30, 2021Last updated:
Conditions

Trial Snapshot

Phase
Not Applicable
Enrollment
28
Locations
2
Primary Endpoint
visual-Attention Bias Index (vABI)

Study Overview

Brief Summary

Randomized Controlled Trial (RCT) aiming at assessing the efficacy of a novel rehabilitation protocol, based on repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (r- TMS) in combination with a conventional cognitive treatment (CCT). The protocol will be statistically compared to the same CTT administered without the r-TMS in a sample of traumatic brain injury patients (age between 18 and 80 years) with left hemispatial Neglect.

Detailed Description

BACKGROUND: A frequent and disabling impairment in persons who suffered traumatic brain injury (TBI) is left hemi-spatial neglect (LHSN). LHSN is a spatial attentive syndrome, characterized by a reduced ability to attend, perceive and consciously represent the left contra-lesional space, in the absence of a primary sensory deficit. Persons with LHSN fail to attend any stimulus coming from the left space and this can affect the ability to carry out many everyday tasks, such as walking, eating, reading and getting dressed. Those patients, as a direct consequence of the brain injury and LHSN, are also often affected by anosognosia for hemiplegia and for LHSN, which is the lack of awareness about motor and cognitive deficits. This condition hinders motor and cognitive recovery, predisposes to falls and reduces independence. Furthermore, in TBI LHSN is often associated with a mixture of attention, memory, executive function, and processing speed deficits leading to complex cognitive and behavioral pictures, which may even interfere with the administration of standard cognitive treatments for LHSN (i.e. visual scanning protocols or prism adaptation). It is also known that 1 Hz inhibitory repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation (rTMS), applied for two weeks to the posterior parietal cortex (PPC) of the unaffected hemisphere in patients with LHSN due to ischemic lesion of the right hemisphere, induces a significant improvement of visual-spatial symptoms that persists 15 days after rTMS treatment. These results can be explained considering that spatial attention deficit in LHSN due to a right middle cerebral artery territory stroke relates to abnormal activation of neural system that mediates spatial attentive operations in the healthy brain. In LHSN, a lesion of the right PPC and of the inter-hemispheric connectivity causes an imbalance in interhemispheric activity due to hyperactivity of the left hemisphere which, in turn, causes a biased attentive allocation towards ipsilesional space. As a consequence, an inhibition of this hyperactivity may have a rebalancing effect, reducing left spatial attention deficit in LHSN. Indeed, recent studies in stroke showed also the possibility of improving the efficacy of standard cognitive treatments (i.e. visual scanning) if the latter are preceded by inhibitory rTMS on the unaffected hemisphere. What is not known is whether also in LHSN due to TBI, inhibitory rTMS on the left PPC followed by a visual scanning protocol may be an effective treatment as in right hemisphere stroke, considering that in TBI the damage is often more widespread and multifocal than in the former condition.

AIMS:

  • To compare the efficacy of a combined r-TMS and CCT intervention aiming at reducing cognitive symptoms of LHSN, in a sample of TBI patients with LHSN, within the context of an RCT.
  • To evaluate the long- term impact of the intervention and evaluate the effect of the intervention on several clinical measures (activity of daily living, attentive and motor functions) and on psychophysiological indices

METHODS: Randomized controller trial, with blind assessments on pretest, postest and on 3 months follow-up.

POPULATION: TBI patients with clinical evidence of LHSN. INTERVENTION: Inhibitory low-frequency r-TMS on the left parietal cortex combined with a conventional cognitive treatment (visual scanning training) for 2 weeks.

Study Design

Study Type
Interventional
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention Model
Parallel
Primary Purpose
Treatment
Masking
Double (Participant, Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility Criteria

Ages
18 Years to 80 Years (Adult, Older Adult)
Sex
All
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No

Inclusion Criteria

  • Diagnosis of TBI;
  • Diagnosis of LHSN with specific assessment tests (line bisection test and / or star cancellation test);
  • Intra-hospital rehabilitation setting (ordinary hospitalization or DH);
  • Age between 18 and 80 years;
  • Time after injury between three weeks and 1 year;
  • Level of cognitive functioning (LCF ≥5 )
  • Adequate language comprehension

Exclusion Criteria

  • Clinical instability at enrollment (for example, fever, acute internist conditions, etc.);
  • Presence of epileptogenic alterations to the EEG and / or previous epileptic seizures;
  • Presence of intracranial implants of metallic material;
  • Presence of devices that could be altered by rTMS, such as pacemakers, ventriculo-peritoneal derivations, Baclofen pump;
  • Acute neurosurgery, including decompressive craniotomy;
  • Drugs conditioning the state of consciousness-vigilance such as benzodiazepines;
  • Cortical blindness and / or visual agnosia;
  • Concomitant psychiatric disorders and / or history of substance abuse;
  • Post-traumatic agitation
  • Post-traumatic complications (i.e. hydrocephalus)

Outcomes

Primary Outcomes

visual-Attention Bias Index (vABI)

Time Frame: up to 21 days post baseline and up to 90 days follow-up

Change from Baseline: visual-Attention Bias Index (vABI). Psychophysiological index of inter-hemispheric imbalance in a visual-spatial attention task

Secondary Outcomes

  • test of Attention Performance (TAP/TEA)(up to 21 days post baseline and up to 90 days follow-up)
  • behavioral Inattention Test (BIT)(up to 21 days post baseline and up to 90 days follow-up)
  • functional independence measure (FIM)(up to 21 days post baseline and up to 90 days follow-up)
  • Motricity Index (MI)(up to 21 days post baseline and up to 90 days follow-up)
  • Trunk Control Test (TCT)(up to 21 days post baseline and up to 90 days follow-up)
  • Level of Cognitive Functioning (LCF)(up to 21 days post baseline and up to 90 days follow-up)
  • catherine Bergegò Scale (CBS)(up to 21 days post baseline and up to 90 days follow-up)
  • Inter Hemispheric transmission Time (IHTT)(up to 21 days post baseline and up to 90 days follow-up)

Investigators

Sponsor Class
Other Gov
Responsible Party
Sponsor

Study Sites (2)

Loading locations...

Similar Trials