CRyoAblation vs AntiaRrhythmic Drugs for Persistent Atrial Fibrillation Trial
Overview
- Phase
- Phase 4
- Intervention
- Arctic Front Advance® balloon catheter
- Conditions
- Atrial Fibrillation
- Sponsor
- Hospital San Carlos, Madrid
- Enrollment
- 196
- Locations
- 1
- Primary Endpoint
- Survival time with atrial fibrilation, auricular flutter or tachycardia
- Status
- Completed
- Last Updated
- 7 months ago
Overview
Brief Summary
This is a prospective, randomized, multicenter study comparing the relative efficacy and safety of cryoablation of PVs using the Arctic Front Advance® balloon catheter with antiarrhythmic therapy in patients with persistent AF.
Detailed Description
The ablation of pulmonary veins is a very effective treatment for the treatment of paroxysmal atrial fibrillation. The benefit of the isolation of pulmonary veins in persistent atrial fibrillation seems to be minor and the level of scientific evidence available requires additional clinical trials to define the value of ablation in this type of patients. The symptomatology of atrial fibrillation recurrences is variable among patients and among differens moments in the same patient. Pharmacological treatment and ablation have been used to reduce the symptomatology of atrial fibrillation recurrences and to increase the proportion of asymptomatic recurrences. Different forms of electrical monitoring of the heart rate are used to evaluate the effectiveness of an intervention. Frequents monitoring periods provide the information of the heart rate and the effect of any intervention. The "Confirm RX heart monitor® (Abbott)" is a subcutaneous implantable device that provides continuous monitoring of the heart rate for more than 3 years without any effect on cardiac function. This implantable Holter automatically detects and saves atrial and ventricular arrhythmic episodes. The device can be analyzed in person or remotely, and can help to make decisions regarding anticoagulant and antiarrhythmic treatment of patients, while representing a powerful research tool for evaluate the effectiveness of different therapeutic options. This is a prospective, randomized, multicenter study that compares the relative efficacy and safety of cryoablation of pulmonary veins using the Arctic Front Advance® balloon catheter with antiarrhythmic treatment in patients with persistent atrial fibrilation.
Investigators
Nicasio Perez Castellano
Principal Investigator
Hospital San Carlos, Madrid
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria
- •Patients with recurrent persistent atrial fibrilation
Exclusion Criteria
- •Patients with atrial fibrilation for more than one year at baseline
- •Atrial fibrilation prior ablation
- •Age\> 75 years or \<18 years
- •Hyperthyroidism
- •Hypertrophic cardiomyopathy
- •Severe valvular disease (stenosis or regurgitation)
- •Carriers of cardiac valves
- •Anteroposterior diameter of left atrium\> 50 mm (left parasternal long axis)
- •Contraindications for anticoagulation
- •Left atrial thrombus
Arms & Interventions
Cryoablation
Cryoablation for bidirectional block of all pulmonary veins
Intervention: Arctic Front Advance® balloon catheter
Cryoablation
Cryoablation for bidirectional block of all pulmonary veins
Intervention: Confirm RX heart monitor® (Abbott)
Antiarrythmics
The drug will be chosen based on the preference of the researcher based on clinical practice guidelines.
Intervention: Antiarrhythmic drug
Antiarrythmics
The drug will be chosen based on the preference of the researcher based on clinical practice guidelines.
Intervention: Confirm RX heart monitor® (Abbott)
Outcomes
Primary Outcomes
Survival time with atrial fibrilation, auricular flutter or tachycardia
Time Frame: Up to 9 months.
Survival time without atrial fibrilation, atrial flutter or atrial tachycardia of more than 2 minutes duration detected by Holter
Presence of death or one major complications.
Time Frame: thirteen month
Presence of death or one of the following major complications: Stroke, systemic embolism, acute myocardial infarction, cardiac tamponade, need for transfusion, diaphragmatic paralysis lasting more than 24 hours or causing respiratory failure, atrioesophageal fistula, stenosis of VP, Sustained (\> 30 sec) or symptomatic ventricular tachycardia, Syncope secondary to bradyarrhythmias or tachyarrhythmias, Need for hospitalization due to cardiovascular causes or related to the study treatments, Any Serious Adverse Reaction or Serious Adverse Event related to the study treatments.
Secondary Outcomes
- Percentage of patient with need to consult the emergency room or hospitalization due to cardiovascular events(thirteen month)
- Percentage of patient with cardioversion(thirteen month)
- Percentage of patient with need a change or suspension of antiarrhythmic due to inefficiency(thirteen month)
- Percentage of patients without atrial fibrilation, flutter or tachycardia(thirteen month)
- Percentage of patient with need for ablation or re-ablation not scheduled(thirteen month)