MedPath

Cognitive Rehabilitation in Patients With Depression

Not Applicable
Conditions
Depression
Interventions
Behavioral: Computerized Cognitive Training
Behavioral: Goal Management Training
Registration Number
NCT03338413
Lead Sponsor
Lovisenberg Diakonale Hospital
Brief Summary

Depression is a highly prevalent and debilitating mental disorder, ranked one of the leading causes of disability worldwide. Several studies have identified neuropsychological deficits in populations of depressed patients affecting domains including attention, memory and executive functioning. These deficits often persist even in patients whose depressive symptoms have remitted. Cognitive impairment in depression represent a core feature of depression, and a valuable target for intervention. Identification of methods that would lead to amelioration would be of great clinical interest, and cognitive rehabilitation (CR) could be a potential way of achieving this. To date few studies on cognitive rehabilitation in depression has been conducted, but the preliminary results are promising. Still the demonstration of long-term effects and evidence relating to improved daily life executive functioning (i.e., generalization) is lacking. In the present study different group-based cognitive rehabilitation interventions will be compared. The aim of the study is to investigate if a group-based "brain training" intervention can improve executive function in patients with active and remitted depression. Efficacy will be assessed immediately after intervention, but also six months after the intervention.

Detailed Description

Not available

Recruitment & Eligibility

Status
UNKNOWN
Sex
All
Target Recruitment
100
Inclusion Criteria
  • Completed treatment for mild or moderate MDD
  • Evidence of executive dysfunction in everyday life determined by (a) a structured interview or (b) a self-report Behavior Rating Inventory of Executive Function (BRIEF) T-score < 55.
Exclusion Criteria
  • Cognitive, sensory, physical, or language impairment affecting the capacity to complete the training program.
  • Premorbid neurological disease or insult and/or comorbid neurological disorder.
  • Reported ongoing alcohol or substance abuse.
  • Psychotic disorders.
  • Actively suicidal.
  • Personality disorder sever enough to interfere with the protocol.
  • Not fluent in Norwegian language.

Study & Design

Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Study Design
PARALLEL
Arm && Interventions
GroupInterventionDescription
Computerized Cognitive TrainingComputerized Cognitive Training-
Goal Management TrainingGoal Management Training-
Primary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
Behavior Rating Inventory of Executive Function (BRIEF: self and informant form)Change from baseline up to 6 months

Executive function in daily life (range:70-210). Higher score indicate greater executive dysfunction.

Secondary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
Performance on Conners Continuous Performance test III incl. CATAchange from baseline up to 6 months
Performance on Wisconsin Card Sorting Testchange from baseline up to 6 months
Performance on D-KEFS Color Word Interference Testchange from baseline up to 6 months
Performance on The Emotional Stroopchange from baseline up to 6 months
Performance on the Emo 1-back taskchange from baseline up to 6 months
Score on Cognitive Failures Questionnaire (CFQ)change from baseline up to 6 months

Assess frequency of cognitive failures (range:0-100). Higher Score indicate more frequent cognitive failures.

Score on Goal Attainment Scaling (GAS)change from baseline up to 6 months
Score on Beck Depression Inventory II (BDI-II)change from baseline up to 6 months

Higher score indicate a higher level of depression (range: 0-63).

Score on Clinical Outcomes in Routine Evaluation Outcome Measure (CORE-OM)change from baseline up to 6 months

Assess the level of current psychological distress (range:0-136). Higher score indicate higher level of distress.

Score on General Perceived Self-Efficacy Scalechange from baseline up to 6 months

Assess a general sense of perceived self-efficacy (range:10-40). Higher score indicate higher self-efficacy.

Score on Return to Work Self-Efficacy Scale (RTW-SE)change from baseline up to 6 months

Assess self-efficacy in the Return to work context (range:0-55). Higher score indicate higher self-efficacy.

Score on Difficulties in Emotion Regulation Scale (DERS)change from baseline up to 6 months

Higher score indicate a higher level of difficulties in emotion regulation (range:36-180).

Score on The Ruminative Response Scale (RRS)change from baseline up to 6 months

Higher score indicate a higher level of ruminative responses (range: 22-88).

Trial Locations

Locations (1)

Lovisenberg Diaconal Hospital

🇳🇴

Oslo, Norway

Lovisenberg Diaconal Hospital
🇳🇴Oslo, Norway
© Copyright 2025. All Rights Reserved by MedPath