Comparing Rezum and Urolift
- Conditions
- Prostate Cancer
- Registration Number
- NCT06820606
- Lead Sponsor
- Chinese University of Hong Kong
- Brief Summary
This is a randomized controlled trial using a non-inferiority design with the subjects randomized 1:1 to either water vapour thermal treatment (REZUM) arm or prostatic urethral lift (UroLift) arm.
- Detailed Description
Not available
Recruitment & Eligibility
- Status
- RECRUITING
- Sex
- Male
- Target Recruitment
- 120
- Male ≥ 50 years Symptomatic BPH International prostate symptom score (IPSS) ≥13 Prostate volume 30-80ml
- History or high suspicion of prostate cancer
- Current urinary tract infection
- Refractory urinary retention or post-void residual (PVR) ≥250 mL
- Intravesical prostatic protrusion (IPP)>10mm
- Prior prostate surgery
- Known or suspected allergy to nickel, titanium, or polyester/polypropylene
- Urethral stricture, meatal stenosis, bladder neck contracture
- Neurogenic bladder and/or sphincter abnormalities
Study & Design
- Study Type
- INTERVENTIONAL
- Study Design
- PARALLEL
- Primary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method Changes in International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS) at 12 months after treatment Baseline, 3 months, 6 months and 12 months after intervention IPSS score ranging from 0-35 (the higher the worse)
- Secondary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method Hospital stays of procedure From the time patient is hospitalised until the time he discharges Measure the hours of in-patient hospitalisation
Number of days on Foley's catheter or self-catheterization after operation 30 days after intervention Complication rate 30 days after intervention Assessed by Clavien-Dindo classification
Post-op quality of life score (International Prostate QOL score) Baseline, 3 months, 6 months and 12 months after intervention Change in quality of life assessed by change in International Prostate QOL score (Ranges from 0 to 6; 0 being the best while 6 being the worst)
Post-op quality of life score (EQ5D-5L questionnaire) Baseline, 3 months, 6 months and 12 months after intervention Change in quality of life assessed by Quality of life: EQ5D-5L questionnaire
Change in voiding function in uroflowmetry (Maximum flow rate) Baseline, 3 months, 6 months and 12 months after intervention It is assessed by maximum flow rate (ml/s) in uroflowmetry
Change in voiding function in uroflowmetry (Post void volume) Baseline, 3 months, 6 months and 12 months after intervention It is assessed by post void volume (ml) in uroflowmetry
Post-op erectile function (IIEF-EF) Baseline, 3 months, 6 months and 12 months after intervention Assessed by Erectile function and Ejaculatory function using International Index of Erectile Function Questionnaire - Erectile function domain (IIEF-EF)
Post-op erectile function (MSHQ-EjD-SF) Baseline, 3 months, 6 months and 12 months after intervention Assessed by Erectile function and Ejaculatory function using Male Sexual Health Questionnaire - ejaculatory dysfunction (EjD) Short Form (MSHQ-EjD-SF)
Unplanned readmission rate after operation in 30 days 30 days after intervention Percentage of patients with unplanned readmission
Cost of procedure and related hospitalization At 12 months after treatment
Related Research Topics
Explore scientific publications, clinical data analysis, treatment approaches, and expert-compiled information related to the mechanisms and outcomes of this trial. Click any topic for comprehensive research insights.
Trial Locations
- Locations (1)
Prince of Wales Hospital, The Chinese University of Hong Kong
🇭🇰Hong Kong, Hong Kong