Comparison of the clinical performance of immediate dentin sealant versus delayed dentin sealant in the cementation of adhesive partial restorations: Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial
Not Applicable
- Conditions
- Dental Caries
- Registration Number
- SLCTR/2022/017
- Lead Sponsor
- niversidad Autónoma del Estado de Hidalgo
- Brief Summary
Not available
- Detailed Description
Not available
Recruitment & Eligibility
- Status
- Pending
- Sex
- Not specified
- Target Recruitment
- Not specified
Inclusion Criteria
• Men and women
* Over the age of 18
* Patients who have at least one tooth with extensive caries involving at least two tooth surfaces.
• That they provide contact details for follow-up.
• That the dental organ to intervene present vitality.
• Absence of periodontal disease.
• That has no symptoms to percussion tests.
• Patients with type II cavities at least 3mm deep
Exclusion Criteria
• That the patient presents root canal treatment in the dental organ to be intervened.
• That presents exposure of the pulp chamber partially or totally during the procedure.
• That during the radiographic evaluation there is some type of anomaly that indicates suspicion of pulpal injury.
Study & Design
- Study Type
- Interventional
- Study Design
- Not specified
- Primary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method 1.To evaluate of postoperative sensitivity after cementation of the restoration in the group with dentin sealant and without immediate dentin sealant using a visual analog scale [One day after cementation restauration]<br>
- Secondary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method To evaluate the state of the cemented restoration after the procedure in the group with and without dentin sealing using the Veneres evaluation criteria six month after intervention(Gresnigt MM, Kalk W, Ozcan M. Randomized clinical trial of indirect resin composite and ceramic veneers: up to 3-year follow-up. J Adhes Dent. 2013 Apr;15(2):181-90. doi: 10.3290/j.jad.a28883. PMID: 23534025) [Six month after the intervention ]<br>