Skip to main content
Clinical Trials/NCT02861729
NCT02861729
Completed
Not Applicable

Clinical Outcomes of Zirconia-reinforced Lithium Silicate Partial Coverage Crowns Compared to Lithium Disilicate Partial Coverage Crowns: A Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial

Cairo University1 site in 1 country46 target enrollmentMay 1, 2017

Overview

Phase
Not Applicable
Intervention
Not specified
Conditions
Partial Coverage Restoration
Sponsor
Cairo University
Enrollment
46
Locations
1
Primary Endpoint
Survival rate
Status
Completed
Last Updated
7 years ago

Overview

Brief Summary

The purpose of this randomized controlled clinical trial is to evaluate the clinical outcomes of Partial Coverage Restorations fabricated with zirconia-reinforced lithium silicate ceramic system compared to partial coverage restorations fabricated with lithium disilicate ceramic system.

Detailed Description

This study is constructed to assess in patients with carious vital posterior teeth whether the use of Vita Suprinity® (VITA Zahnfabrik H. Rauter GmbH \& Co.KG- Germany) Zirconia reinforced lithium silicate partial coverage restorations will result in higher survival rates and better patient related outcome scores compared to IPS-e.max® CAD (Ivoclar Vivadent AG, Schaan - Liechtenstein) lithium disilicate partial coverage restorations.

Registry
clinicaltrials.gov
Start Date
May 1, 2017
End Date
July 18, 2018
Last Updated
7 years ago
Study Type
Interventional
Study Design
Parallel
Sex
All

Investigators

Responsible Party
Principal Investigator
Principal Investigator

Hanaa Sayed abdo Hassan Nassar

PHD student

Cairo University

Eligibility Criteria

Inclusion Criteria

  • Participants:
  • Good oral hygiene, papillary bleeding index (PBI) \< 35%.
  • Positive patient acceptance to participate in the trial.
  • Carious class II or MOD lesions
  • Vital upper or lower posterior teeth with no signs of irreversible pulpitis.
  • Normal occlusion
  • Single tooth restoration (no edentulous space that requires fixed prosthesis)

Exclusion Criteria

  • Participants
  • Pregnancy.
  • Disabilities.
  • Systemic disease or severe medical complications.
  • Bad oral hygiene
  • Heavy smoking.
  • Xerostomia.
  • Lack of compliance.
  • Evidence of severe bruxism, clenching, or temporomandibular disorders.
  • Deep carious defects (close to pulp, less than 1 mm distance).

Outcomes

Primary Outcomes

Survival rate

Time Frame: 12 month

Absolute failure is defined by clinical unacceptable fracture and crack development which required a replacement of the entire restoration, and/or secondary caries as well as endodontic complications

Secondary Outcomes

  • Restorations with surface roughness as assessed tactilely by US public health service criteria(12 month)
  • Restorations with color mismatch with adjacent teeth as assessed visually by US public health service criteria(12 month)
  • Restorations with Marginal gap as assessed visually by US public health service criteria(12 month)
  • Restorations with Marginal discoloration as assessed visually by US public health service criteria(12 month)
  • Restorations developed secondary caries as assessed visually by US public health service criteria(12 month)

Study Sites (1)

Loading locations...

Similar Trials