Comparing Use of the Glidescope Cobalt to Direct Laryngoscopy in Infants
- Conditions
- Intubation
- Registration Number
- NCT01163656
- Lead Sponsor
- Children's Hospital of Philadelphia
- Brief Summary
The investigators seek to prospectively compare intubation with the Glidescope Cobalt to Direct Laryngoscopy (DL) in infants.
- Detailed Description
We seek to study the intubation characteristics of a new video laryngoscope, the Glidescope Cobalt in children less than or equal to 1 yr of age. This evaluation would provide insight as to the efficacy of this device in facilitating intubation in infants.
Recruitment & Eligibility
- Status
- COMPLETED
- Sex
- All
- Target Recruitment
- 66
- Scheduled to undergo elective surgery at CHOP
- American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) Physical Status I or II
- Anesthetic plan requiring tracheal intubation with a neuromuscular relaxant
- Parental/guardian permission (informed consent). Subjects will be too young to understand the study procedures and therefore assent will not be sought. -
- At known or anticipated high risk for aspiration pneumonia
- Known or predicted difficult intubation as assessed by the clinical attending anesthesiologist
- Emergency surgical procedure
- Patients with preoperative airway pathology or stridor -
Study & Design
- Study Type
- INTERVENTIONAL
- Study Design
- PARALLEL
- Primary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method Time to Tracheal Intubation Measured the time of the randomized device past the teeth/gums until its removal after intubation as the time to intubation. The amount of time it takes the anesthesiologist to insert a breathing tube using one of two methods, either by direct laryngoscopy or using the Glidescope Cobalt Video system.
- Secondary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method
Trial Locations
- Locations (1)
The Children's Hospital of Philadelphia
🇺🇸Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States
The Children's Hospital of Philadelphia🇺🇸Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States