King Vision Video Laryngoscope Versus Glidescope Video Laryngoscope
- Conditions
- Difficult Intubation
- Interventions
- Device: King Vision Video LaryngoscopeDevice: Glidescope Video Laryngoscope
- Registration Number
- NCT02324465
- Lead Sponsor
- Vanderbilt University
- Brief Summary
The investigators plan to conduct a randomized trial comparing the intubation success rate and time of the King Vision Video Laryngoscope to the Glidescope video laryngoscope in order to demonstrate the comparability of the devices.
- Detailed Description
Both the King Vision and Glidescope video laryngoscopes are advanced airway devices that are relatively low cost and are designed to improve the efficiency of both routine and difficult intubation. Both systems use disposable blades, which eliminates the need for blade sterilization and may minimize the risk of infectious exposure to patients and improve cost and efficiency associated with the sterilization processing of non-disposable laryngoscopes. The Glidescope has been commercially available longer than the King Vision, and has been more frequently studied.
Although similar in many respects, the King Vision and Glidescope systems have differing designs which may result in differences in speed and success in the management of routine and/or difficult airways.
Recruitment & Eligibility
- Status
- TERMINATED
- Sex
- All
- Target Recruitment
- 40
- Adult patients scheduled for elective, ambulatory surgery requiring general anesthesia and endotracheal intubation
- Patients who require rapid sequence induction and intubation or fiberoptic intubation.
- Pregnancy
Study & Design
- Study Type
- INTERVENTIONAL
- Study Design
- PARALLEL
- Arm && Interventions
Group Intervention Description King Vision Video Laryngoscope King Vision Video Laryngoscope The patient would be randomized to intubation via use of the King Vision VL Glidescope Video Laryngoscope Glidescope Video Laryngoscope The patient would be randomized to intubation via use of the Glidescope VL
- Primary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method Time Until Intubation With Each Device <100 seconds time from the introduction of the laryngoscope into the oral cavity to endotracheal tube reaching the glottic aperture
- Secondary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method Mean Pulse Oximetry Saturation Value Reading During Intubation <100 seconds Total Number of Assisted Maneuvers Required to Complete Intubation (Includes All Participants in Arm) <100 seconds Assisted Maneuvers can include laryngeal manipulation, head lift, Backward Upward Rightward Pressure, stylet removed, Cricoid pressure, scope manipulation and bougie.
Trial Locations
- Locations (1)
Vanderbilt University Medical Center
🇺🇸Nashville, Tennessee, United States