McGrath Mac VideoLaryngoscope vs the Macintosh Laryngoscope
Not Applicable
Terminated
- Conditions
- Tracheal Intubation
- Registration Number
- NCT02292901
- Lead Sponsor
- Hopital Foch
- Brief Summary
Videolaryngoscopes become widely used. The aim of this study is to compare McGrath Mac videolaryngoscope to conventional MacIntosh laryngoscope in patients without known risk of difficult of mask ventilation and of tracheal intubation.
- Detailed Description
Not available
Recruitment & Eligibility
- Status
- TERMINATED
- Sex
- All
- Target Recruitment
- 158
Inclusion Criteria
- patient scheduled for a general anesthesia with orotracheal intubation
Exclusion Criteria
- predictable risk of difficult mask ventilation or of difficult tracheal intubation
- necessity of a rapid sequence induction
- contra-indication to sufentanil, to propofol, or to atracurium
- ENT, thoracic surgery, or intracranial surgery
Study & Design
- Study Type
- INTERVENTIONAL
- Study Design
- PARALLEL
- Primary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method Ease of tracheal intubation 1 hour Ease of intubation is measured using the Intubation Difficulty Scale (Adnet et al. Anesthesiology 1997;87(6):1290-1297)
- Secondary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method Postoperative hoarseness one day Rate of hemodynamic abnormality one hour Time to obtain the first capnogram (sec) one hour Score of Cormak and Lehane modified by Yentis one hour POGO (percentage of glottic opening) score one hour Rate of use of alternative techniques for intubation one hour Rate of esophageal intubation one hour Incidence of arterial oxygen desaturation (SpO2 <92%) one hour Rate of failure of tracheal intubation one hour Questionnaire of Salditt-Isabel one hour Postoperative throat pain one day
Related Research Topics
Explore scientific publications, clinical data analysis, treatment approaches, and expert-compiled information related to the mechanisms and outcomes of this trial. Click any topic for comprehensive research insights.
What are the molecular mechanisms by which videolaryngoscopes improve tracheal intubation success rates compared to direct laryngoscopy techniques?
How does the McGrath Mac videolaryngoscope compare to other video laryngoscope models like the GlideScope in terms of intubation efficiency and complication rates?
Are there specific airway anatomical biomarkers that predict better outcomes with video laryngoscopy versus MacIntosh laryngoscopy in routine clinical practice?
What adverse events are associated with video laryngoscopy use in non-difficult intubation cases compared to traditional direct laryngoscopy methods?
How do video laryngoscope technologies like McGrath Mac influence the broader landscape of airway management devices in anesthesia practice?
Trial Locations
- Locations (2)
Institut Hospitalier Franco-Britannique
🇫🇷Levallois-Perret, Hauts de Seine, France
Hopital Foch
🇫🇷Suresnes, Hauts de Seine, France
Institut Hospitalier Franco-Britannique🇫🇷Levallois-Perret, Hauts de Seine, France