Effect of calisthenic exercise versus conventional treatment on non specific neck pain : A Randomised control trial
Overview
- Phase
- Not Applicable
- Status
- Completed
- Sponsor
- KLE Academy of Higher Education and Research Belagavi
- Enrollment
- 32
- Locations
- 1
- Primary Endpoint
- Pain will be recorded using Numeric Pain Rating Scale, Assessment of disability using Neck Disability Index, Assessment using Pressure Biofeedback, Craniovertebral angle measured using MB ruler5.3
Overview
Brief Summary
EFFECT OF CALLISTHENIC EXERCISES VERSUS CONVENTIONAL TREATMENT ON NON-SPECIFIC NECK PAIN: A RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL
Aim of the study - To determine and compare the effect of callisthenic exercises versus conventional treatment in individuals with non-specific neck pain.
Null hypothesis - There will be no difference in the effect of callisthenic exercises and conventional treatment on pain, cervical muscle endurance and neck disability index in individuals with non-specific neck pain.
Alternative hypothesis - There will be a change in the effect of callisthenic exercises and conventional treatment on pain, cervical muscle endurance and neck disability index in individuals with non-specific neck pain.
Inclusion criteria - 1. Individuals aged 18-50 years, with non-specific neck pain. 2. Pain intensity more than 3 out of 10 on NPRS(Numerical Pain Rating Scale).3.Individuals willing to participate in the study.
Exclusion criteria - 1. History of fracture, trauma, injury or recent surgeries of cervical, spine and upper limb that would prevent the participants to perform the exercise.2. Past six-month history of fracture, trauma, injury or recent surgeries of cervical, spine and upper limb & lower limb that would prevent the participants to perform the exercise.3. Pregnant women.4.Diagnosed cases of serious pathology such as specific neck pain due to disc prolapsed, tumour of cervical spine, whiplash injury, cervical fractures, cervicogenic headache, and any neurological signs consistent with nerve root compression.
Study Design
- Study Type
- Interventional
- Allocation
- Randomized
- Masking
- None
Eligibility Criteria
- Ages
- 18.00 Year(s) to 50.00 Year(s) (—)
- Sex
- All
Inclusion Criteria
- •1.Individuals within the age group 18-50 years, with with non-specific neck pain.
- •2.Pain intensity more than 3 out of 10 on NPRS(Numerical Pain Rating Scale) 3.Individuals willing to participate in the study.
Exclusion Criteria
- •1.History of fracture, trauma, injury or recent surgeries of cervical, spine and upper limb that would prevent the participants to perform the exercise.
- •2.Past six month history of fracture, trauma, injury or recent surgeries of cervical, spine and upper limb & lower limb that would prevent the participants to perform the exercise.
- •3.Pregnant women.
- •4.Diagnosed cases of serious pathology such as specific neck pain due to disc prolapsed, tumor of cervical spine, whiplash injury, cervical fractures, Cervicogenic head ache, and any neurological signs consistent with nerve root compression.
Outcomes
Primary Outcomes
Pain will be recorded using Numeric Pain Rating Scale, Assessment of disability using Neck Disability Index, Assessment using Pressure Biofeedback, Craniovertebral angle measured using MB ruler5.3
Time Frame: will be done at baseline and after 4 weeks
Secondary Outcomes
No secondary outcomes reported
Investigators
Shivashri Math
KAHER Institute of Physiotherapy Department