跳至主要内容
临床试验/CTRI/2024/09/073538
CTRI/2024/09/073538已完成不适用

Effect of calisthenic exercise versus conventional treatment on non specific neck pain : A Randomised control trial

KLE Academy of Higher Education and Research Belagavi1 个研究点 分布在 1 个国家目标入组 32 人开始时间: 2024年9月15日最近更新:

试验速览

阶段
不适用
状态
已完成
发起方
入组人数
32
试验地点
1
主要终点
Pain will be recorded using Numeric Pain Rating Scale, Assessment of disability using Neck Disability Index, Assessment using Pressure Biofeedback, Craniovertebral angle measured using MB ruler5.3

研究概览

简要总结

EFFECT OF CALLISTHENIC EXERCISES VERSUS CONVENTIONAL TREATMENT ON NON-SPECIFIC NECK PAIN: A RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL

Aim of the study - To determine and compare the effect of callisthenic exercises versus conventional treatment in individuals with non-specific neck pain.

Null hypothesis - There will be no difference in the effect of callisthenic exercises and conventional treatment on pain, cervical muscle endurance and neck disability index in individuals with non-specific neck pain.

Alternative hypothesis - There will be a change in the effect of callisthenic exercises and conventional treatment on pain, cervical muscle endurance and neck disability index in individuals with non-specific neck pain.

Inclusion criteria - 1. Individuals aged 18-50 years, with non-specific neck pain. 2. Pain intensity more than 3 out of 10 on NPRS(Numerical Pain Rating Scale).3.Individuals willing to participate in the study.

Exclusion criteria - 1. History of fracture, trauma, injury or recent surgeries of cervical, spine and upper limb that would prevent the participants to perform the exercise.2. Past six-month history of fracture, trauma, injury or recent surgeries of cervical, spine and upper limb & lower limb that would prevent the participants to perform the exercise.3. Pregnant women.4.Diagnosed cases of serious pathology such as specific neck pain due to disc prolapsed, tumour of cervical spine, whiplash injury, cervical fractures, cervicogenic headache, and any neurological signs consistent with nerve root compression.

研究设计

研究类型
Interventional
分配方式
Randomized
盲法
None

入排标准

年龄范围
18.00 Year(s) 至 50.00 Year(s)(—)
性别
All

入选标准

  • 1.Individuals within the age group 18-50 years, with with non-specific neck pain.
  • 2.Pain intensity more than 3 out of 10 on NPRS(Numerical Pain Rating Scale) 3.Individuals willing to participate in the study.

排除标准

  • 1.History of fracture, trauma, injury or recent surgeries of cervical, spine and upper limb that would prevent the participants to perform the exercise.
  • 2.Past six month history of fracture, trauma, injury or recent surgeries of cervical, spine and upper limb & lower limb that would prevent the participants to perform the exercise.
  • 3.Pregnant women.
  • 4.Diagnosed cases of serious pathology such as specific neck pain due to disc prolapsed, tumor of cervical spine, whiplash injury, cervical fractures, Cervicogenic head ache, and any neurological signs consistent with nerve root compression.

结局指标

主要结局

Pain will be recorded using Numeric Pain Rating Scale, Assessment of disability using Neck Disability Index, Assessment using Pressure Biofeedback, Craniovertebral angle measured using MB ruler5.3

时间窗: will be done at baseline and after 4 weeks

次要结局

未报告次要终点

研究者

发起方
KLE Academy of Higher Education and Research Belagavi
申办方类型
Private medical college
责任方
Principal Investigator
主要研究者

Shivashri Math

KAHER Institute of Physiotherapy Department

研究点 (1)

Loading locations...

相似试验