Xenodiagnosis After Antibiotic Treatment for Lyme Disease
- Conditions
- Lyme Disease
- Interventions
- Procedure: Skin biopsyProcedure: Blood drawDevice: Xenodiagnosis
- Registration Number
- NCT02446626
- Brief Summary
Background:
The most common tick-borne illness in the United States, Lyme disease is caused by Borrelia burgdorferi bacteria that are transmitted to people by Ixodes scapularis ticks. Most cases of Lyme disease are cured by antibiotics, but some patients continue to experience symptoms despite the absence of detectable Lyme bacteria. Xenodiagnosis uses a vector to detect the presence of a disease-causing microbe. Researchers will use live, laboratory-bred ticks to see if Lyme disease bacteria can be detected in people after completing antibiotic therapy and if that is more common in people who continue to experience symptoms such as fatigue and joint pain.
Objectives:
- To see if ticks can be used to detect B. burgdorferi in people who have had Lyme disease and received antibiotic therapy and if it correlates with persistent symptoms.
Eligibility:
* Adults at least 18 years old who have:
* Untreated erythema migrans (the Lyme disease rash); OR
* Untreated Lyme arthritis; OR
* Continuing symptoms after treatment for Lyme disease; OR
* Had Lyme disease and antibiotic treatment within the past 12 months.
* Healthy volunteers
Design:
* Participants will be screened with medical history, physical exam, and blood tests.
* Visit 1:
* Blood and urine tests, health questionnaire.
* Up to 30 laboratory-bred, pathogen-free, larval ticks (each smaller than a poppy seed) will be placed under a dressing.
* Participants may have two small biopsies of skin .
* 4 6 days later, Visit 2:
* Dressing will be removed and ticks will be collected.
* Participants will answer symptom questions.
* If many ticks are still attached, participants will have to come back the next day. If not enough ticks feed successfully, the procedure may be repeated.
* Participants will keep a diary of symptoms for 30 days. Over 3 months, they will be return to the clinic 3 times to see how they feel and answer questionnaires. Test results will be discussed.
- Detailed Description
Lyme disease is the most common vector borne disease in the United States. Although antibiotic therapy is clinically effective in treating the symptoms of Lyme disease for most patients early in the course of disease, a significant number of patients who receive therapy report persistent symptoms. The cause of persistent symptoms after antibiotic therapy for Lyme disease is an area of great controversy. Recent studies have shown that the organism (Borrelia burgdorferi) may persist in animals after antibiotic therapy and can be detected by using the natural tick vector (Ixodes scapularis) to acquire the organism through feeding (xenodiagnosis). Whether this occurs in humans is unknown. Currently available tests for human Lyme disease do not allow determination of persistent infection after antibiotic therapy.
We performed the first study of the use of I. scapularis larva for the xenodiagnosis of B. burgdorferi infection in humans. Our pilot study showed that xenodiagnosis was well tolerated with no severe adverse events (AEs). The most common AE was mild itching at the site. In this small pilot study, xenodiagnosis for B. burgdorferi was positive in 2 participants and indeterminate in 2 participants. Further studies are needed to determine the sensitivity of xenodiagnosis in evaluating the infection status of Lyme disease patients.
In this proposal, we want to further investigate the utility of xenodiagnosis for identifying persistence of infection with B. burgdorferi in treated human Lyme disease. Our objectives include assessing the link between detection of B. burgdorferi by xenodiagnosis and persistence of symptoms in patients diagnosed with Lyme disease, within 1 year, post therapy; compare the rate of detection of B. burgdorferi by xenodiagnosis after therapy in participants with posttreatment Lyme disease symptoms; identify subject characteristics related to the likelihood of detecting B. burgdorferi by xenodiagnosis including: time from infection, time between infection and therapy, time from therapy; and continue to assess the safety of xenodiagnosis in humans.
The results of study have the potential to resolve this long-standing controversy in Lyme disease pathogenesis. While xenodiagnosis is unlikely to be widely used in clinical practice due to the labor intensity and speed of testing, if our study shows a linkage between positive xenodiagnostic testing and persistence of symptoms after B. burgdorferi infection, it may prove to be a useful tool for testing new strategies for treatment and for correlation with more generally applicable diagnostic markers. Understanding the pathogenesis of persistent symptoms following Lyme disease, and identifying reliable diagnostic tests for determining the success of antibiotic therapy, is critical to the medical management of these patients.
Recruitment & Eligibility
- Status
- COMPLETED
- Sex
- All
- Target Recruitment
- 72
Not provided
Not provided
Study & Design
- Study Type
- INTERVENTIONAL
- Study Design
- PARALLEL
- Arm && Interventions
Group Intervention Description Cohort #1: Patients with Lyme disease, post-therapy Blood draw Participants with Lyme disease, post-therapy had 25-30 clean laboratory-reared larval ticks applied as close as possible to the previous site of Lyme disease manifestation. Ticks were secured under a retention dressing and allowed to attach to the research participant. Ticks were removed 3 - 6 days after the placement. Cohort #1: Patients with Lyme disease, post-therapy Xenodiagnosis Participants with Lyme disease, post-therapy had 25-30 clean laboratory-reared larval ticks applied as close as possible to the previous site of Lyme disease manifestation. Ticks were secured under a retention dressing and allowed to attach to the research participant. Ticks were removed 3 - 6 days after the placement. Cohort #2: Patients with post-Lyme disease symptoms (PTLDs) Blood draw Participants with post-treatment Lyme disease symptoms (PTLDS) at least 12-months from initial treatment had 25-30 clean laboratory-reared larval ticks applied as close as possible to the previous site of Lyme disease manifestation. Ticks were secured under a retention dressing and allowed to attach to the research participant. Ticks were removed 3 - 6 days after the placement. Cohort #1: Patients with Lyme disease, post-therapy Skin biopsy Participants with Lyme disease, post-therapy had 25-30 clean laboratory-reared larval ticks applied as close as possible to the previous site of Lyme disease manifestation. Ticks were secured under a retention dressing and allowed to attach to the research participant. Ticks were removed 3 - 6 days after the placement. Cohort #3: New Acute Erythema Migrans Skin biopsy Participant with new onset of acute erythema migrans had 25-30 clean laboratory-reared larval ticks applied as close as possible to the site of Lyme disease manifestation. Ticks were secured under a retention dressing and allowed to attach to the research participant. Ticks were removed 3 - 6 days after the placement. Acute erythema migrans participant (possible positive control) Cohort #4: Untreated Lyme Arthritis Blood draw Participant with untreated Lyme arthritis had 25-30 clean laboratory-reared larval ticks applied as close as possible to the site of Lyme disease manifestation. Ticks were secured under a retention dressing and allowed to attach to the research participant. Ticks were removed 3 - 6 days after the placement. Lyme Arthritis participant (possible positive control) Cohort #2: Patients with post-Lyme disease symptoms (PTLDs) Xenodiagnosis Participants with post-treatment Lyme disease symptoms (PTLDS) at least 12-months from initial treatment had 25-30 clean laboratory-reared larval ticks applied as close as possible to the previous site of Lyme disease manifestation. Ticks were secured under a retention dressing and allowed to attach to the research participant. Ticks were removed 3 - 6 days after the placement. Cohort #5: Healthy Volunteers Xenodiagnosis Healthy volunteers with no history of Lyme disease had 25-30 clean laboratory-reared larval ticks applied to a body site that was comfortable for participant. Ticks were secured under a retention dressing and allowed to attach to the research participant. Ticks were removed 3 - 6 days after the placement. Healthy Volunteers (negative control) Cohort #2: Patients with post-Lyme disease symptoms (PTLDs) Skin biopsy Participants with post-treatment Lyme disease symptoms (PTLDS) at least 12-months from initial treatment had 25-30 clean laboratory-reared larval ticks applied as close as possible to the previous site of Lyme disease manifestation. Ticks were secured under a retention dressing and allowed to attach to the research participant. Ticks were removed 3 - 6 days after the placement. Cohort #4: Untreated Lyme Arthritis Skin biopsy Participant with untreated Lyme arthritis had 25-30 clean laboratory-reared larval ticks applied as close as possible to the site of Lyme disease manifestation. Ticks were secured under a retention dressing and allowed to attach to the research participant. Ticks were removed 3 - 6 days after the placement. Lyme Arthritis participant (possible positive control) Cohort #4: Untreated Lyme Arthritis Xenodiagnosis Participant with untreated Lyme arthritis had 25-30 clean laboratory-reared larval ticks applied as close as possible to the site of Lyme disease manifestation. Ticks were secured under a retention dressing and allowed to attach to the research participant. Ticks were removed 3 - 6 days after the placement. Lyme Arthritis participant (possible positive control) Cohort #5: Healthy Volunteers Blood draw Healthy volunteers with no history of Lyme disease had 25-30 clean laboratory-reared larval ticks applied to a body site that was comfortable for participant. Ticks were secured under a retention dressing and allowed to attach to the research participant. Ticks were removed 3 - 6 days after the placement. Healthy Volunteers (negative control) Cohort #3: New Acute Erythema Migrans Blood draw Participant with new onset of acute erythema migrans had 25-30 clean laboratory-reared larval ticks applied as close as possible to the site of Lyme disease manifestation. Ticks were secured under a retention dressing and allowed to attach to the research participant. Ticks were removed 3 - 6 days after the placement. Acute erythema migrans participant (possible positive control) Cohort #3: New Acute Erythema Migrans Xenodiagnosis Participant with new onset of acute erythema migrans had 25-30 clean laboratory-reared larval ticks applied as close as possible to the site of Lyme disease manifestation. Ticks were secured under a retention dressing and allowed to attach to the research participant. Ticks were removed 3 - 6 days after the placement. Acute erythema migrans participant (possible positive control) Cohort #5: Healthy Volunteers Skin biopsy Healthy volunteers with no history of Lyme disease had 25-30 clean laboratory-reared larval ticks applied to a body site that was comfortable for participant. Ticks were secured under a retention dressing and allowed to attach to the research participant. Ticks were removed 3 - 6 days after the placement. Healthy Volunteers (negative control)
- Primary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method Detection of Borrelia Burgdorferi in Ticks After Xenodiagnosis Procedure 3-6 days post tick placement Recovered ticks after feeding on research participants were tested for presence of B. burgdorferi using at least one of three procedures:
1. Test ticks by polymerase chain reaction (PCR) and culture - Injection of tick lysate into severe combined immunodeficiency (SCID) mice with subsequent PCR and culture testing
2. Test ticks using isothermal amplification reaction included in the PCR electrospray ionization mass spectroscopy
3. Test ticks by PCR using the Tick-borne disease Capture Sequencing Assay (TBDCapSeq)Participants With Adverse Event Related to the Application of Ticks (Xenodiagnosis) Up to 30-days after tick removal Safety of xenodiagnosis in humans was assessed by number of participants with adverse event related to the application of ticks. Adverse event was assessed using participants self-reported diary cards and clinical interview.
- Secondary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method
Trial Locations
- Locations (5)
Tufts Medical Center
🇺🇸Boston, Massachusetts, United States
Stony Brook University (State University of New York)
🇺🇸Stony Brook, New York, United States
New York Medical College
🇺🇸Valhalla, New York, United States
Mansfield Family Practice
🇺🇸Storrs, Connecticut, United States
National Institutes of Health Clinical Center, 9000 Rockville Pike
🇺🇸Bethesda, Maryland, United States