MedPath

Validation of a Knee Brace for Gonarthrosis

Not Applicable
Completed
Conditions
Gonarthrosis
Registration Number
NCT05814471
Lead Sponsor
TOPMED
Brief Summary

A study about the effects of different fastening systems for knee braces on comfort, ease of installation and treatment efficacy both physical and psychological. Two different systems will be tested, velcro straps and a cable-fastening system.

Detailed Description

There are 2 main types of knee braces for gonarthrosis: soft knee braces and rigid knee braces. Soft knee braces use malleable materials such as cloth or rubber to apply forces on the leg whereas rigid braces use plastic or metal shells. Three main types of fastening systems are used on these types of orthoses: velcro systems, hybrid systems and cable fastening systems. Therefore, different configurations exist to reduce biomechanical deficits caused by the pathology.

Each fastening system has its advantages and disadvantages. Velcro straps are fast and intuitive to use, altough multiple difficulties are mentionned: adjusment, cleaning, the number of straps needed to maintain the knee brace in position as well as the noise while detaching the straps. Hybrid systems regularly use velcro straps to which are added quick-release fasteners to simplify the installation and uninstallation process. Cable fastening systems also use quick-release fasteners. The adjusment process is simple and precise with minimal noise with these systems.

Comfort, efficacy and ease of use are essential qualities of a knee brace. Confort is primordial as it is directly linked to treatment adherence by the patients. Efficacy of a knee brace treatment may be measured by symptom or medication use evolution but also with daily practice of problematic movement by the patient. Ease of use must be optimized as it presents an opportunity to increase treatment adherence. The goal of the fastening system developped in partnership with Laboratoires Victhom is to increase ease of use of the knee brace while maintaining comfort and treatment efficacy.

Recruitment & Eligibility

Status
COMPLETED
Sex
All
Target Recruitment
5
Inclusion Criteria
  • Has worn an ODRA knee brace multiple hours a day during the last 6 months
Exclusion Criteria
  • Wounds on the lower body

Study & Design

Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Study Design
CROSSOVER
Primary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
Ease of Use Measurement ScaleDirectly after the 2 weeks of intervention with each brace, assessed after a brace fitting protocol and a few minutes of wearing the intervention brace.

The scale was developped for this study. The mesure is an average of 5 items with 5 point scale rating system(1 harder to use; 5 easier to use). Mean score ranges from (1 harder to use; 5 easier to use)

Comfort Measurement ScaleDirectly after the 2 weeks of intervention with each brace, assessed after a brace fitting protocol and a few minutes of wearing the intervention brace.

The scale was developped for this study. The mesure is an average of 2 items with 5 point scale rating system(1 lowest comfort; 5 highest comfort). Total score is adjusted to 0 (lowest comfort) to 100 (highest comfort).

Psychological SymptomsChange between directly after 2 weeks adjustment period and directly after 2 weeks of use for each arm

Psychological Symptoms Inventory Total Score(Ilfeld, F. W. (1976). Further validation of a psychiatric symptom index in a normal population. Psychological Reports, 39(3, Pt 2), 1215-1228.). Minimum=0; (No symptoms); Maximum=100(Worst Symptoms);

Physical SymptomsChange between directly after 2 weeks adjustment period and directly after 2 weeks of use for each arm

Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Total Score (KOOS), translated to French(Quebec). Minimum=0(worst symptoms); Maximum=100(no symptoms);

Secondary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod

Trial Locations

Locations (1)

TOPMED

🇨🇦

Québec, Quebec, Canada

TOPMED
🇨🇦Québec, Quebec, Canada
Edith Martin, PhD
Contact
4187801301
emartin@topmed.ca
Marianne Lancelot
Contact
4187801301
mlancelot@topmed.ca

MedPath

Empowering clinical research with data-driven insights and AI-powered tools.

© 2025 MedPath, Inc. All rights reserved.