MedPath

Complications From the Use of Calcium Phosphate Paste in Mandibular Lengthening Osteotomies

Conditions
Jaw Anomalies
Infection
Interventions
Other: Hydroset
Procedure: Standard sagittal split osteotomy
Registration Number
NCT02918344
Lead Sponsor
Universitair Ziekenhuis Brussel
Brief Summary

The goal of this study is to determine if the use of calcium phosphate paste in mandibular lengthening surgery causes more complications as surgical site infections and hardware removal.

An evaluation will be made to determine if the benefits of the use of the paste (3D-stability, prevention of early relapse and unaesthetic indentation) outweighs the disadvantages.

Detailed Description

The sagittal split osteotomy (SSO) is commonly used to correct dentofacial discrepancies. Correction of distocclusion can be achieved through lengthening of the mandible, and a balanced facial appearance can be obtained by increasing chin projection.

Calcium phosphate paste is used in mandibular lengthening surgery to avoid an unaesthetic notching at the lower border(1)(2) and to help stabilize the segments when osteosynthesis slippage is feared for. A recently performed retrospective study showed an increase of infectious complications when calcium phosphate paste was used for this indications. Several precautions were identified that could be undertaken to decrease the infectious complications. The study concluded that a prospective study was required in which these precautions were implemented to determine whether infectious complications can be reduced.

The aim of this study is to investigate whether the hardened paste still increases the incidence of site infections after implementation of several precautions and the use of a standardized antibiotic prophylactic protocol.

Recruitment & Eligibility

Status
UNKNOWN
Sex
All
Target Recruitment
192
Inclusion Criteria
  • All patients with dysgnatic deformities requiring mandibular lengthening surgery
  • Gender: M/F
  • Age: >15y-75y
Exclusion Criteria
  • Previous orthognathic surgery
  • Congenital facial malformations
  • Unilateral SSO
  • Immunodeficiency
  • Simultaneous removal of lower third molars
  • Incomplete postoperative follow-up

Study & Design

Study Type
OBSERVATIONAL
Study Design
Not specified
Arm && Interventions
GroupInterventionDescription
Cohort/Hydroset groupHydrosetPatients undergoing sagittal split osteotomy with paste application
Standard sagittal split osteotomy groupStandard sagittal split osteotomyPatients undergoing sagittal split osteotomy without paste application
Cohort/Hydroset groupStandard sagittal split osteotomyPatients undergoing sagittal split osteotomy with paste application
Standard sagittal split osteotomy groupHydrosetPatients undergoing sagittal split osteotomy without paste application
Primary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
Surgical site infection6 months

Determine the number of surgical site infection

Secondary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
Hardware removal6 months

Determine the number of hardware removal

Revision6 months

Determine the number of revisions

Trial Locations

Locations (1)

universitair Ziekenhuis brussel

🇧🇪

Jette, Brussels, Belgium

© Copyright 2025. All Rights Reserved by MedPath