The LAMA Trial: Laparoscopic Correction of Perforated Peptic Ulcer Versus Open Correction
Not Applicable
Completed
- Conditions
- Perforated Peptic Ulcer
- Registration Number
- NCT00745667
- Lead Sponsor
- Erasme University Hospital
- Brief Summary
This is a multicenter trial comparing laparoscopic correction of a perforated peptic ulcer with the open technique by upper laparotomy. Hypothesis is that after laparoscopic correction will be discharged 3 days sooner due to less postoperative pain and complications.
- Detailed Description
as written above
Recruitment & Eligibility
- Status
- COMPLETED
- Sex
- All
- Target Recruitment
- 109
Inclusion Criteria
- All patients clinical suspected for perforated peptic ulcer
Exclusion Criteria
- Pregnancy
- Younger than 18 years
- Unable to sign consent form
Study & Design
- Study Type
- INTERVENTIONAL
- Study Design
- PARALLEL
- Primary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method days of discharge 7 days
- Secondary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method postoperative VAs pain score and opiate usage; postoperative complications; Quality of live (RAND 36, euroquol) follow up 1 year
Trial Locations
- Locations (1)
Diaconessenhuis
🇳🇱Leiden, Netherlands
Diaconessenhuis🇳🇱Leiden, Netherlands