Comparison of two surgical techniques for treatment of calcaneal fracture.
Not Applicable
- Conditions
- Calcaneos fracture.Fracture of calcaneus
- Registration Number
- IRCT2016051327872N1
- Lead Sponsor
- Mashhad University of Medical Sciences
- Brief Summary
Not available
- Detailed Description
Not available
Recruitment & Eligibility
- Status
- Complete
- Sex
- All
- Target Recruitment
- 36
Inclusion Criteria
Inclusion critaria: calcaneal close fracture; age more tha 18 years and less than 75 years , exclusion critaria: open calcaneal fracture; no indication for surgical treatment; uncontrolled systemic diseases; simultanous foot fracture
Exclusion Criteria
Not provided
Study & Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Study Design
- Not specified
- Primary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method AOFAS score. Timepoint: 6 months and one year later. Method of measurement: Filling the questionaire.;Wound dehiscence. Timepoint: During three weeks after the surgery. Method of measurement: Visit the surgical wound.;Wound infection. Timepoint: During 3 weeks after the surgery. Method of measurement: Purulent discharge and culture of discharge.;VAS scorer. Timepoint: 6 months and one year after the surgery. Method of measurement: Filling the questionaire.;SF36. Timepoint: 6 months and one year after the surgery. Method of measurement: Filling the questionaire.;Accuracy of reduction. Timepoint: The day after surgery and one year later. Method of measurement: Measurement of the Bohler's and Gissane angles on lateral radiograph and articular surface reduction on coronal CT scan of the ankle.
- Secondary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method on-union. Timepoint: 6 months and one year after the surgery. Method of measurement: On the plain radiographs and CT scan of the ankle.;Malunion. Timepoint: 6 months and one year after the surgery. Method of measurement: Using plane radiographs and CT scan of the ankle.