MedPath

COronary Re-engageMent aFter randOm NavitoR alignmenT (COMFORT STUDY)

Recruiting
Conditions
Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement
Aortic Valve Stenosis
Interventions
Procedure: TAVR Aligned
Procedure: TAVR Random
Registration Number
NCT05779787
Lead Sponsor
Niguarda Hospital
Brief Summary

Whereas PCI before TAVR was previously recommended despite its uncertain prognostic role, recent data underline the possibility of a postponed coronary intervention using a commissural alignment technique. This approach allows easy coronary re-engagement through the valve stent frame with a trade off paid of procedure complexity.

Considering the prevalence of coronary artery disease (CAD) and the increasing percentage of younger patients treated with TAVI, investigate whether a simpler procedure with random implantation of Navitor valve is not inferior in terms of coronary re-access, is required The key point of the project will be the evaluation of the feasibility of coronary re-engagement after a Navitor valve randomly implanted.

Detailed Description

Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation (TAVI) is recommended by European and American guidelines to treat patients with aortic stenosis regardless of procedural risk (1, 2). In the last decades the increasing percentage of younger patients treated with TAVI, reflect the extensive indications in lower risk setting, highlighting the importance of easy coronary re-engagement after valve implantation. Considering the prevalence and the progression of a pre-existing coronary artery disease (CAD), the timing of coronary intervention should be accurate selected (3) addressing the percentage of unplanned percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) after TAVI (4). In fact, while PCI before TAVR was previously recommend despite the uncertain prognostic role (5), recent data remarks the possibility of a postponed coronary intervention using a commissural alignment technique (6) that allows a predictable stent frame position in the sinus of Valsalva (7). Moreover, following the emerging concept of easy re-access, only a few types of prostheses have been shown to have an high degree of stent position predictability after implantation, leading to a limited option in terms of prosthesis choice. Furthermore, to achieve the best results with commissural alignment technique, accurate procedure planning and operator's expertise are required in order to properly manage the valve specific orientation in the aorta with consequent increase in time, radiation and procedure complexity.

However, geometry of the stent frame (height and size) and the anatomical characteristics of patients have to be enlisted as contributory factors to difficult coronary re-engagement and need to be evaluate in order to establish the feasibility of the re-access after TAVR.

The investigators' findings could provide data regarding the non-inferiority rate of coronary cannulation after a simpler procedure with Navitor implantation without alignment technique. Due to these results, the valves portfolio available in patients with coronary artery disease that needed PCI after TAVR, could be larger and various allowing the best protheses choice according to the patient's anatomy and operator's expertise. Finally, knowing the predictors of difficult re-engagement for both types of valves, regardless of implantation technique, could be interesting for an even more valve tailored approach.

The purpose of this study is to investigate the feasibility of coronary re-engagement after randomly (not aligned) Navitor implantation, as already perform in current clinical practice, due to a lower predictable orientation of this type of valve.

Recruitment & Eligibility

Status
RECRUITING
Sex
All
Target Recruitment
100
Inclusion Criteria

Not provided

Exclusion Criteria

Not provided

Study & Design

Study Type
OBSERVATIONAL
Study Design
Not specified
Arm && Interventions
GroupInterventionDescription
TAVR performed with random implantation of Navitor valve (Random Group)TAVR AlignedPatients with severe aortic stenosis undergoing TAVR procedure performed with random implantation of Navitor Valve
TAVR performed with commissural alignment technique (Aligned Group)TAVR RandomPatients with severe aortic stenosis undergoing TAVR procedure performed with commissural alignment technique. We consider in this groups only the Accurate and Accurate Neo 2 Valve which are the first choice due to the best stent frames position predictability with this technique
TAVR performed with random implantation of Navitor valve (Random Group)TAVR RandomPatients with severe aortic stenosis undergoing TAVR procedure performed with random implantation of Navitor Valve
TAVR performed with commissural alignment technique (Aligned Group)TAVR AlignedPatients with severe aortic stenosis undergoing TAVR procedure performed with commissural alignment technique. We consider in this groups only the Accurate and Accurate Neo 2 Valve which are the first choice due to the best stent frames position predictability with this technique
Primary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
Coronary re-access after TAVR procedureDuring procedure

Re-engagement of LMCA and RCA after valve implantation is defined as selective cannulation and subsequent selective angiography. All others type of re-engagement will be classify as "non selective". We will stratify also the modality of re-cannulation in relation to the position of the valves' stent struts as "above", "across" and "behind".

Secondary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
Total Implant RadiationsDuring procedure

Total Radiations required for valve implantation. We count the radiations used from the alignment in the aorta to the end of valve opening (Alignment time + Implantation time).

Total Implant ContrastDuring procedure

Total Contrast required for valve implantation

Alignment RadiationDuring procedure

Radiation required for commissural alignment

Alignment Fluoroscopy TimeDuring procedure

Fluoroscopy time required for commissural alignment

Implant Fluoroscopy TimeDuring procedure

Fluoroscopy time required for valve implantation

Implant RadiationDuring procedure

Radiation required for valve implantation

Re-Engagement RadiationDuring procedure

Radiation required for re-engagement

Total Implant TimeDuring procedure

Total time required for valve implantation. We count the time from the alignment in the aorta to the end of valve opening (Alignment Fluoroscopy time + Implantation Fluoroscopy time).

Re-Engagement Contrast usedDuring procedure

Contrast required for coronary re-engagement

Re-Engagement TimeDuring procedure

Time required for coronary re-engagement

Total Implant Fluoroscopy TimeDuring procedure

Total Fluoroscopy time required for valve implantation. We count the time from the alignment in the aorta to the end of valve opening (Alignment time + Implantation time).

Implant ContrastDuring procedure

Contrast required for valve implantation

Re-Engagement Fluoroscopy TimeDuring procedure

Fluoroscopy time required for coronary re-engagement

Trial Locations

Locations (1)

ASST GOM Niguarda

🇮🇹

MIlano, Lombardia, Italy

© Copyright 2025. All Rights Reserved by MedPath