跳至主要内容
临床试验/NCT06144242
NCT06144242进行中(未招募)不适用

Randomized-controlled Trial to Assess Whether Feedback on a New Stewardship Metric Can Improve Antibiotic-prescribing for Acute Respiratory Tract Infections in Urgent Care Clinics

Daniel Livorsi2 个研究点 分布在 1 个国家目标入组 90 人开始时间: 2024年1月1日最近更新:
适应症

试验速览

阶段
不适用
状态
进行中(未招募)
发起方
入组人数
90
试验地点
2
主要终点
Frequency of antibiotic-prescribing for RTD visits

研究概览

简要总结

Many clinicians prescribe antibiotics for patients with acute respiratory infections even when antibiotics will not benefit the patient because the infection is due to a virus. To discourage this type of unnecessary antibiotic use, the investigators will assess whether it is helpful to give clinicians feedback on how often they prescribe antibiotics for respiratory infections in comparison to their peers. The investigators will perform this study across Urgent Care and QuickCare clinics within a single healthcare system.

详细描述

The investigators have used an established HEDIS (Healthcare Effectiveness Data and Information Set) metric to evaluate Urgent Care and QuickCare clinicians on their antibiotic use for respiratory tract diagnoses (RTDs). This RTD metric excludes visits that are more complicated, based on well-defined criteria. Based on our baseline assessment (2018-2022), the investigators estimate that most clinicians in this setting are frequently prescribing unnecessary antibiotics.

The investigators will perform a randomized controlled trial to assess whether providing individualized feedback to clinicians on the RTD metric can safely reduce antibiotic use for qualifying respiratory tract visits across Urgent and QuickCare settings within a single integrated healthcare system. Clinicians who do not opt-out of the trial will be randomized to either receive feedback or not receive feedback on this RTD metric. The trial will last for 18 months. The primary outcome of effectiveness will be the frequency of antibiotic-prescribing for RTD visits. Secondary outcomes include total antibiotic use (regardless of diagnosis), changes in the use of diagnostic codes, 30-day rates of follow-up visits and hospital admissions. The RE-AIM framework will be used to guide additional study evaluation.

研究设计

研究类型
Interventional
分配方式
Randomized
干预模型
Parallel
主要目的
Health Services Research
盲法
None

入排标准

年龄范围
21 Years 至 99 Years(Adult, Older Adult)
性别
All
接受健康志愿者

入选标准

  • 未提供

排除标准

  • 未提供

结局指标

主要结局

Frequency of antibiotic-prescribing for RTD visits

时间窗: 24 hours of visit

Percentage of all qualifying respiratory tract diagnosis (RTD) visits prescribed an antibiotic

次要结局

  • Frequency of antibiotic-prescribing for all visits(24 hours of visit)
  • Follow-up visit to Urgent Care or QuickCare(30 days)
  • Follow-up Emergency Department visit and/or acute-care hospitalization(30 days)

研究者

发起方
Daniel Livorsi
申办方类型
Other
责任方
Sponsor Investigator
主要研究者

Daniel Livorsi

Associate Professor

University of Iowa

研究点 (2)

Loading locations...

相似试验

Improving Antibiotic Use for ARIs in Urgent Care... | 临床试验