The comparison of hemodynamic response following new technique and traditional spinal anesthesia in elderly patient posted for orthopedic surgery.
Not Applicable
Completed
- Conditions
- Health Condition 1: - Health Condition 2: M972- Periprosthetic fracture around internal prosthetic ankle joint
- Registration Number
- CTRI/2023/02/049774
- Lead Sponsor
- Post Graduate Institute of YCMH
- Brief Summary
Not available
- Detailed Description
Not available
Recruitment & Eligibility
- Status
- Completed
- Sex
- Not specified
- Target Recruitment
- 120
Inclusion Criteria
Patients posted for elective lower limb surgeries like femur surgeries, PFN with nailing, hemiarthroplasty etc.
Patients of ASA 1,2 & 3 of either sex.
Age > 60 years and above.
Height between 150-175 cm.
Weight between 40-85 kg.
Exclusion Criteria
Patients of ASA 4 & 5
Patients on anticoagulants
With any bleeding disorder
Neurological deficit
History of drug allergy to local anasthetic
Any local infection
Known autonomic neuropathy
Study & Design
- Study Type
- Interventional
- Study Design
- Not specified
- Primary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method To compare hemodynamic response following novel epidural volume extension technique and traditional spinal anesthesia for orthopaedic surgery in elderly patients.Timepoint: Just after Anesthesia till surgery is over
- Secondary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method evel of maximum sensory block,two segment regression time,level of motor block,duration of analgesia,side effectsTimepoint: 24 hours postoperatively