RibFix Blu Thoracic Fixation System Versus Non-surgical Treatment in Non-flail Chest Rib Fractures
- Conditions
- Rib; Fracture
- Registration Number
- NCT05146986
- Lead Sponsor
- Zimmer Biomet
- Brief Summary
This is a prospective, multi-center, observational, cohort study involving skilled cardiothoracic surgeons who are experienced in implanting the treatment of non-flail chest rib fractures and the use of RibFix Blu Thoracic Fixation System.
- Detailed Description
The objective of this study is to evaluate the benefits of surgical stabilization of rib fractures (SSRF) in patients with non-flail chest rib fractures using RibFix Blu Thoracic Fixation System when compared to non-surgical (analgesia and symptomatic management) treatment. The study will include up to 167 cases of non-flail chest rib fractures with 95 cases in non-surgical treatment group and 72 cases in the surgical group. Each center may enroll up to maximum 30 cases to permit the assessment of outcome across a variety investigators and clinical settings. Enrolment will be competitive among sites and closed as soon as a total of 167 cases are recruited.
Recruitment & Eligibility
- Status
- RECRUITING
- Sex
- All
- Target Recruitment
- 167
- Age 18 and above (inclusive)
- Simple rib fracture with ≥ 3 consecutive ribs, and the broken ends showed clear displacements
- Indicated for surgical repair of rib fractures using RibFix Blu Thoracic Fixation System or non-surgical treatment (analgesia and symptomatic management treatment)
- Willing and able to complete scheduled follow-up evaluations as described in the study protocol
- Has participated in the Informed Consent process and is willing and able to sign an Institutional Review Board or Ethics Committee (IRB/EC) approved Patient Information/ Informed consent Form (PICF)
-
Flail chest rib fractures based on radiological or clinical findings
-
Previous rib fractures or pulmonary problems, requiring continuous oxygen use at home pre-trauma
-
Presence of any serious medical issues that placed patient in generally poor conditions such that he or she could not tolerate the surgery
-
Chest trauma associated with severe craniocerebral injury, abdominal organ injury, severe spinal injury, limb fracture, or pelvic fracture requiring long-term bed rest
-
Has serious medical disease that is a contraindication for general anesthesia, such as cerebral infarction, myocardial infarction and hemorrhagic syndrome
-
Any contraindications listed in the manufacturer's Instruction to use for RibFix Blu Thoracic Fixation System as per below:
- Spanning a midline sternotomy
- Active Infection
- Foreign body sensitivity
-
Is known to be pregnant
-
Is a prisoner, known alcohol or drug user or mentally incompetent or unable to understand what participation in this study entails.
-
Participation in another surgical intervention that may influence any of the outcome parameters.
Study & Design
- Study Type
- OBSERVATIONAL
- Study Design
- Not specified
- Primary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method Thoracic pain as assessed by numeric Rating Scale (NRS) 2 weeks Level of thoracic pain determined using a numeric Rating Scale (NRS). Thoracic pain will be determined using an 11-point Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) in which 0 implicates no pain and 10 the worst pain. If a subject is not able to provide a response to the level of thoracic pain,
- Secondary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method Length of Hospital stay 12 weeks Length of Hospital stay by the difference groups
Pulmonary function 2 weeks, 6 weeks and 12 weeks Pulmonary function will be assessed by the measuring the forced expiratory volume (FEV) using a spirometer.
Rate of Analgesic use 12 weeks Analgesic use by the difference groups
Number of Participants with respiratory complications 2 weeks, 6 weeks and 12 weeks Complications from the different groups assessed to be related to respiratory.
Quality of life using EuroQoL-5L 2 weeks, 6 weeks and 12 weeks Health related qualify of life using EuroQoL-5L(EQ-5D-5L) questionnaires from the different groups.
A standardized measure of health-related quality of life states consisting of 5 dimensions, namely mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort, and anxiety/depression. The EQ-5D-5L version was used in the study. Each dimension has 5 responses recording 5 levels of severity (no problems/slight problems/moderate problems/severe problems or extreme problems). The responses to the EQ-5D dimensions are used to obtain a single EQ-5D index value where 1 represents full health and 0 represents death. The questionnaire also includes a vertical, visual analogue scale (EQ VAS) for the respondents to record their self-rated health where the 2 extreme ends of the scale are labelled as 'Best imaginable health state' and 'Worst imaginable health state' respectively
Trial Locations
- Locations (5)
Hunter New England Health District
🇦🇺Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
Flinders Medical Centre
🇦🇺Bedford Park, South Australia, Australia
The Alfred (Alfred Health)
🇦🇺Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
Yonsei Wonju Severance Christian Hospital
🇰🇷Wŏnju, Gangwon-do, Korea, Republic of
Ajou University Hospital
🇰🇷Suwon si, Gyeonggi-do, Korea, Republic of
Hunter New England Health District🇦🇺Sydney, New South Wales, AustraliaZsolt Janos BaloghPrincipal Investigator