NCT03580798
Terminated
N/A
Ridge Preservation Comparing the Traditional Approach vs. Early Implant Placement With Simultaneous Contour Augmentation
ConditionsTooth Loss
Overview
- Phase
- N/A
- Intervention
- Not specified
- Conditions
- Tooth Loss
- Sponsor
- University of Louisville
- Enrollment
- 7
- Locations
- 1
- Primary Endpoint
- Final ridge width for simultaneous and delayed grafting treatment.
- Status
- Terminated
- Last Updated
- 5 years ago
Overview
Brief Summary
Comparison of the clinical healing of simultaneous vs. delayed grafting for dental implant placement.
Detailed Description
The primary aims of this study are to compare the clinical and histologic results of a traditional ridge preservation with implant placement at 16 weeks (control group) with early implant placement (8 weeks) with simultaneous contour augmentation as described by Buser (test group).
Investigators
Henry Greenwell
Director of Graduate Peridontics
University of Louisville
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria
- •Have one non-molar maxillary tooth requiring extraction that will be replaced by a dental implant. The site must be bordered by 2 teeth.
- •Healthy persons at least 18 years old.
- •Patients must sign an informed consent approved by the University of Louisville Human Studies Committee.
Exclusion Criteria
- •Patients with debilitating systemic disease, or diseases that have a clinically significant effect on the periodontium.
- •Exclude any molar tooth.
- •Presence of or history of osteonecrosis of jaws.
- •Patients with current or previous history of IV bisphosphonates, irrespective of duration.
- •Patients taking oral bisphosphonates for ≥ 3 years.
- •Pregnant women.
- •Allergy to any material or medication used in the study.
- •Patients who need prophylactic antibiotics prior to dental procedures.
- •Previous head and neck radiation therapy.
- •Chemotherapy in the previous 12 months.
Outcomes
Primary Outcomes
Final ridge width for simultaneous and delayed grafting treatment.
Time Frame: 16 to 20 weeks
Measure final ridge width to determine if adequate bone is available.
Secondary Outcomes
- Soft tissue thickness(16 to 20 weeks)
- Histology(16 weeks)
- Implant dehiscence(20 weeks)
Study Sites (1)
Loading locations...
Similar Trials
Completed
N/A
Ridge Preservation Comparing an Intrasocket Graft Alone to an Intrasocket Graft Plus a Facial Overlay GraftClinical EfficacyNCT01431131University of Louisville24
Completed
N/A
Implant Placement With Simultaneous Gum GraftingEdentulousNCT01431144University of Louisville27
Completed
N/A
The Clinical Effect of Implant Placement With a Simultaneous Soft Tissue AllograftDental ImplantsNCT02139748University of Louisville28
Terminated
N/A
The Effect of Immediate Implant Placement and Provisionalization in the Esthetic ZoneJaw, Edentulous, PartiallyNCT02021331University of Michigan5
Completed
N/A
Esthetic Outcomes of Immediately Placed Implants Receiving Immediate Provisionalization and Delayed RestorationTooth DiseasesTooth ExtractionDental ImplantNCT01925339University of Michigan40