跳至主要内容
临床试验/NCT05586984
NCT05586984招募中不适用

A Prospective, Observational Trial of Transvaginal Uterine Suspension With the New Minimally Invasive Uterine Suspension

National Cheng-Kung University Hospital1 个研究点 分布在 1 个国家目标入组 90 人开始时间: 2022年7月26日最近更新:
适应症

试验速览

阶段
不适用
状态
招募中
入组人数
90
试验地点
1
主要终点
Recurrence

研究概览

简要总结

Transvaginal or transabdominal surgeries are current choices of uterus-preserving surgeries for pelvic organ prolapse.

Laparoscopic lateral uterine suspension, a modified surgical approach of uterine suspension from bilateral abdominal wall fascia, performed with expected safety and simplicity of surgery besides advantages including small wound incision and fast recovery in laparoscopic surgeries. This trial aim to discuss the therapeutic efficacy, long term safety, and adverse events of laparoscopic lateral uterine suspension and compare with the conventional transvaginal sacrospinous ligament fixation with native tissue repair.

详细描述

Pelvic organ prolapse can be treated either conservatively or surgically. Patients who are unsatisfied with conservative treatment or with severe symptoms often seek for surgical intervention. Transvaginal or transabdominal surgeries are current choices of uterus-preserving surgeries for pelvic organ prolapse. Laparoscopic sacrohysteropexy is the current trend for laparoscopic surgery, with small incisional wound, fast recovery, and low recurrence rate as advantages. However, laparoscopic sacrohysteropexy is often regarded as time consuming and ous sometimes hazard given the complexity of surgical technique and the anatomy of the presacral region. Few cases with severe complications such as vascular injuries, sacral nerve root injuries, and diskitis had been reported with laparoscopic sacrohysteropexy in previous studies.

Laparoscopic lateral uterine suspension, a modified surgical approach of uterine suspension from bilateral abdominal wall fascia, is therefore proposed in our study. The most significant benefits of this novel approach include safety and simplicity of surgery besides advantages including small wound incision and fast recovery in laparoscopic surgeries. This trial aim to discuss the therapeutic efficacy of laparoscopic lateral uterine suspension and compare with the transvaginal sacrospinous ligament fixation with native tissue repair. Other results include safety and adverse events of laparoscopic lateral uterine suspension in long term follow up.

研究设计

研究类型
Observational
观察模型
Cohort
时间视角
Prospective

入排标准

年龄范围
21 Years 至 —(Adult, Older Adult)
性别
Female
接受健康志愿者

入选标准

  • older than 21 years old.
  • uterine prolapse stage 2 at least, defined by C point distal to -1cm by POP-Q system.
  • patients willing to receive a uterine-preserving surgery for pelvic organ prolapse, and is suitable for anesthesia after evaluation.
  • patients who had or had not received conservative treatments for pelvic organ prolapse.
  • patients able and willing to finish the questionnaire evaluation.

排除标准

  • patient who had received a previous hysterectomy, or is planning on concomitant hysterectomy in the surgery for pelvic organ prolapse.
  • patient who had received a previous surgery for pelvic organ prolapse.
  • patient with history of adverse events following a synthetic mesh.
  • patients with chronic or acute pelvic pain.
  • patients who had received abdominal or pelvic irradiation.
  • patients who cannot receive either surgery due to comorbidity.
  • patients pregnant or with future plan of pregnancy.
  • patients with vaginal length less than 5cm.

结局指标

主要结局

Recurrence

时间窗: 5 years

Composite outcome of subjective and objective recurrence of uterine prolapse.

次要结局

  • Sexual function outcome(5 years)
  • Urodynamic outcome(6 months)
  • Anatomical outcome(5 years)
  • Functional outcome(5 years)

研究者

申办方类型
Other
责任方
Principal Investigator
主要研究者

Yu Fang Huang

Professor Yu Fang Huang

National Cheng-Kung University Hospital

研究点 (1)

Loading locations...

相似试验

Transvaginal Sacrospinous Hysteropexy Versus... | 临床试验