MedPath

Re-thinking the Role of Peers And Training Patients [RePeAT]

Not Applicable
Conditions
Cardiovascular Diseases
Interventions
Behavioral: Peer Coach
Registration Number
NCT05933655
Lead Sponsor
University of Rochester
Brief Summary

This study, Re-thinking the role of Peers And Training Patients \[RePeAT\], is designed to test the feasibility of training peer-coaches to prepare limited health literacy (LHL) patients to engage in shared-decision making (SDM) for cardiovascular disease (CVD) risk-reduction.

Detailed Description

The investigators will use a 2-arm pilot RCT design to assess the feasibility, and acceptability of the intervention. Up to 60 primary care patients will be randomly assigned to participate in the peer-coaching or control group. Patients will be randomized at a 1:1 ratio, stratified by the clinician. Half of the subjects (n=30) will be assigned to the peer-coaching intervention, and the other half will be assigned to the control group.

Recruitment & Eligibility

Status
ENROLLING_BY_INVITATION
Sex
All
Target Recruitment
60
Inclusion Criteria
  • A patient of Highland Family Medicine practice
  • At least 40 years old and no more than 75 years old
  • Be at ≥10% risk for CVD as calculated using the ASCVD Risk Estimator Plus
  • No plans to leave the practice in the next 12 months
  • English speaking
  • Limited Health Literacy (self-report)
Exclusion Criteria
  • Have experienced a prior cardiac or vascular event such as myocardial infarction (MI) or cerebrovascular accident (CVA) or have had a CVD procedure such as installation of a stent or angioplasty
  • Gave peripheral vascular disease, intermittent claudication or peripheral arterial disease
  • Lack of capacity to consent

Study & Design

Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Study Design
PARALLEL
Arm && Interventions
GroupInterventionDescription
Peer CoachPeer CoachThe research coordinator will set up a time for the subject to have a brief discussion with a peer coach from the study team approximately 1 week after randomization. During the coaching session, the peer coach will encourage the subject to mention their heart health goals to their primary care clinician during their next primary care appointment. The peer coach will also help the subject brainstorm ways to remove any barriers that may prevent them from having the discussion with their clinician. The peer coaching session and the subsequent medical appointment will be audio-recorded.
Primary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
ABCS Discussionpatient-clinician office visit, approximately 1 week after the peer coaching session

The investigators will qualitatively code the office visit to determine if subjects engaged in a discussion with their clinician about their ABCS options/preferences.

Secondary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
Peer Coach Fidelitypost-coaching, approximately 1-2 weeks prior to the patient-clinician office visit

The investigators will qualitatively code the peer coaching sessions to determine if peer coaches used Teach-back during their session and if the coaching session was done with fidelity.

Trial Locations

Locations (1)

University of Rochester

🇺🇸

Rochester, New York, United States

© Copyright 2025. All Rights Reserved by MedPath