MedPath

Are Audiovisual Materials Superior to Printed Materials in Improving Awareness Among Type 2 Diabetic Patients?

Not Applicable
Completed
Conditions
Diabetes Mellitus
Interventions
Other: Audiovisual material "video"
Other: Printed material "brochure"
Registration Number
NCT03544645
Lead Sponsor
King Abdullah International Medical Research Center
Brief Summary

This research evaluates the effectiveness of video educations against patients fixed believes and knowledge that either not precise or overestimated, and compare with classic educational method such as Brochure. As many researches indicates the difficulties to initiate insulin therapy for type 2 diabetic patients due to overestimated barriers such as needle anxiety, feelings of guilt and failure, concerns about hypoglycemia, sense of loss of control over one's life and reduced quality of life. This research will introduce different educational tools to evaluate their effectiveness in breaking psychological insulin barriers.

Detailed Description

Introduction This research evaluates the effectiveness of video educations against patients fixed believes and knowledge that either not precise or overestimated, and compare with classic educational method such as Brochure. As many researches indicates the difficulties to initiate insulin therapy for type 2 diabetic patients due to overestimated barriers such as needle anxiety, feelings of guilt and failure, concerns about hypoglycemia, sense of loss of control over one's life and reduced quality of life. This research will introduce different educational tools to evaluate their effectiveness in breaking psychological insulin barriers.

Methodology It's a randomized controlled trial. Validated questionnaire (ITAS) was used to evaluate the psychological insulin barriers, video and Brochures were devolved as educational materials contain same contents and validated. Study conducted in King Abdulaziz city housing with total sample size of 126. They were divided into intervention group (video group) and controlled group (Brochure group). Both group filled the same questionnaire before the intervention. And then immediately after the intervention. Six weeks later, both groups filled the same questionnaire to measure the long-term effects.

Recruitment & Eligibility

Status
COMPLETED
Sex
All
Target Recruitment
126
Inclusion Criteria
  1. Type 2 diabetic patients
  2. Age group from 30 to 70 years
  3. A1c = 8 mg/dL or above
  4. Both genders
Exclusion Criteria
  1. Pregnant women
  2. Blindness or profound vision loss
  3. Severe mental problems e.g. Psychosis

Study & Design

Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Study Design
PARALLEL
Arm && Interventions
GroupInterventionDescription
intervention groupAudiovisual material "video"This group received an audiovisual material "video" as an educational material
control groupPrinted material "brochure"This group received a printed material "brochure" as an educational material
Primary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
compare the impact of audiovisual educational materials verses printed educational materials6 weeks

compare intervention versus control on type 2 diabetic patients' knowledge, attitude and practice towards insulin therapy by assessing the patients before, directly after and 6 weeks after the intervention using a validated questionnaire (ITAS) to evaluate the psychological insulin barriers, both intervention and control were devolved as educational materials contain same contents and validated

Secondary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod

Trial Locations

Locations (1)

King Saud bin Abdulaziz University for Health Sciences

🇸🇦

Riyadh, Saudi Arabia

© Copyright 2025. All Rights Reserved by MedPath