Skip to main content
Clinical Trials/NCT01164059
NCT01164059
Completed
Phase 4

Clinical Effectiveness Of The Newer Antipsychotic Compounds Olanzapine, Quetiapine And Aripiprazole In Comparison With Low Dose Conventional Antipsychotics (Haloperidol And Flupentixol) In Patients With Schizophrenia

University of Bremen18 sites in 1 country149 target enrollmentFebruary 2010

Overview

Phase
Phase 4
Intervention
Olanzapine
Conditions
Schizophrenia
Sponsor
University of Bremen
Enrollment
149
Locations
18
Primary Endpoint
Contentment with treatment: Psychiatrist (CGI)
Status
Completed
Last Updated
10 years ago

Overview

Brief Summary

This study is designed to compare the efficacy and drug tolerability of two strategies for the treatment of schizophrenia. The two strategies consist of utilizing, on the one hand, a conventional antipsychotic like haloperidol or flupentixol and, on the other hand, a newer antipsychotic compound like olanzapine, quetiapine or aripiprazole in patients with schizophrenia.

Detailed Description

There is agreement in the psychiatry community that the so-called atypical antipsychotics should be considered first choice in the treatment of schizophrenic disorders. However, the general superiority of these newer antipsychotic drugs over the older conventional drugs could not be clearly demonstrated in recent controlled clinical trials. The discrepancy between every day's clinical perception and the results of clinical trials raises the question whether the studies performed so far employed the adequate methodological approach to represent the daily practice situation which is characterized by a wide variety of duration and type of the schizophrenic disorder, concomitant diseases, and medications. Moreover, some studies might not have been focused adequately on patient-relevant outcome variables. The present study project is designed to answer these open questions. The innovative character of the study design is 1. that different neuroleptic strategies will be compared rather than single antipsychotic drugs, using 2. an enhanced biometric design, that provides a choice of treatment with respect to the individual patient though the trial as such is randomised controlled and double blind; 3. that clinically relevant endpoints such as quality of life will be the primary variables, and 4. inclusion and exclusion criteria lead to a study population representing clinical every day practice as near as possible. Another innovatory procedure is that serum levels of the study drugs will be recorded twice during the study. The authors hope that their design might yield transfer effects for other clinical trials facing similar problems.

Registry
clinicaltrials.gov
Start Date
February 2010
End Date
March 2014
Last Updated
10 years ago
Study Type
Interventional
Study Design
Parallel
Sex
All

Investigators

Sponsor
University of Bremen
Responsible Party
Principal Investigator
Principal Investigator

Prof. Dr. Eckart Rüther

Principal Investigator

University of Bremen

Eligibility Criteria

Inclusion Criteria

  • Schizophrenia
  • age 18-65 years
  • necessity to establish new or change antipsychotic treatment due to unsatisfying results or side effects
  • written informed consent
  • Exclusion Criteria (amongst others):
  • Known or suspected hypersensitivity to olanzapine, quetiapine, aripiprazole, flupentixol or haloperidol
  • Acute suicidal tendency
  • "Einwilligungsvorbehalt (BGB)" or "Unterbringung (PsychKG)"
  • Organic psychosis
  • Parkinson Disease

Exclusion Criteria

  • Not provided

Arms & Interventions

atypical antipsychotics

Olanzapine, Quetiapine, or Aripiprazole

Intervention: Olanzapine

atypical antipsychotics

Olanzapine, Quetiapine, or Aripiprazole

Intervention: Quetiapine

typical antipsychotics

Haloperidol or Flupentixol

Intervention: Haloperidol

atypical antipsychotics

Olanzapine, Quetiapine, or Aripiprazole

Intervention: Aripiprazole

typical antipsychotics

Haloperidol or Flupentixol

Intervention: Flupentixol

Outcomes

Primary Outcomes

Contentment with treatment: Psychiatrist (CGI)

Time Frame: 24 weeks

Contentment with treatment: Patient (SF-36)

Time Frame: 24 weeks

Secondary Outcomes

  • Subscores of SF-36(24 weeks)
  • Subjective wellbeing under neuroleptic treatment scale (SWN-K)(24 weeks)
  • Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS)(24 weeks)

Study Sites (18)

Loading locations...

Similar Trials