A New Shoulder Proprioceptive Rehabilitative Tool (SRPT) for the Evaluation of the Role of the Shoulder During Reaching
- Conditions
- Shoulder Impingement Syndrome
- Interventions
- Other: shoulder proprioceptive rehabilitation tool
- Registration Number
- NCT02646306
- Lead Sponsor
- University of Roma La Sapienza
- Brief Summary
The aim of the study focused on the creation of a rehabilitative measuring device (SRPT-shoulder proprioceptive rehabilitation tool) and the development of the examination methodology for assessing the proprioception of the glenohumeral joint respect to scapula abduction, within the movement of antepulsion on the sagittal plane both in healthy subjects and in patients with shoulder impingement syndrome.
- Detailed Description
Not available
Recruitment & Eligibility
- Status
- COMPLETED
- Sex
- All
- Target Recruitment
- 44
- Right-handed
- Diagnosis of subacromial right impingement syndrome performed by the orthopedic specialist (nuclear magnetic resonance and/or ultrasound examination)
- Neer stages 1, 2 and 3
- Presence of pain 3 <VAS<8 at baseline
- Age between 55 and 65 years.
- Diabetes mellitus
- Inflammatory systemic diseases
- CNS and/or PNS diseases
- Systemic infectious diseases
- Neoplastic diseases
- Assumption of antidepressants and/or anxiolytics and/or other medications that can affect attention and sensory
- Visual problems not properly compensated
- Previous surgery to the shoulder
Study & Design
- Study Type
- OBSERVATIONAL
- Study Design
- Not specified
- Arm && Interventions
Group Intervention Description Shoulder Impingement Syndrome shoulder proprioceptive rehabilitation tool Execution of two tests in succession with the use of the shoulder proprioceptive rehabilitation tool (SRPT), each oriented to indicate a specific discriminative and integrative mode in the movement of the scapulothoracic. Will be required to each subject to perform recognition tasks that include both retraction movements of the hand, starting from a start position, and approaching movements of the hand, starting from an end position. First test: ability to integrate visual and proprioceptive informations. Second test: discriminative proprioceptive capacity of the subject, thus excluding the contribution of the view. Healthy Subjects shoulder proprioceptive rehabilitation tool Execution of two tests in succession with the use of the shoulder proprioceptive rehabilitation tool (SRPT), each oriented to indicate a specific discriminative and integrative mode in the movement of the scapulothoracic. Will be required to each subject to perform recognition tasks that include both retraction movements of the hand, starting from a start position, and approaching movements of the hand, starting from an end position. First test: ability to integrate visual and proprioceptive informations. Second test: discriminative proprioceptive capacity of the subject, thus excluding the contribution of the view.
- Primary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method Evaluation of the Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) at baseline baseline It is an instrument that enables patients to express their pain intensity as a numerical value. Patients were asked to mark the point that corresponded to their perceived pain intensity on a 10-cm line, with 0 indicating the absence of pain and 10 reflecting the most severe pain
- Secondary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method Evaluation of the short form of the Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand questionnaire (Quick-DASH) at baseline baseline The short form (11 item) of the Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand questionnaire (Quick-DASH) measures physical ability and symptoms of the upper extremity and explores the impact of functional impairment and pain on daily-living tasks, as well as on social and recreational activities, work and sleep. The score ranges from 0 to 100 points, with 0 reflect- ing no disability and 100 corresponding to the most severe disability
Evaluation of the Constant-Murley shoulder outcome score at baseline baseline It is based on subjective (sleep, work, and recreational activities) and objective (ROM and strength) components, adjusted for age and sex, according to normative values reported by Yian et al. The score ranges from 0 (worst result) to 100 (best result).
Trial Locations
- Locations (1)
Umberto I Hospital
🇮🇹Rome, Italy